Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Shure SM-57 Cardioid Dynamic Instrument Microphone
Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on durability and features, Shure SM-57 Cardioid Dynamic Instrument Microphone wins on sound quality and versatility.
The Electro-Voice RE320 excels in specialized applications like broadcasting and kick drums, while the Shure SM-57 offers versatility and value for a wider range of uses.
Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better
Specialization
Better for broadcast and kick drum applications
Durability
Robust design for professional use
Sound Quality
Tailored EQ for specific sound needs
Why Shure SM-57 Cardioid Dynamic Instrument Microphone is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $98.00
Versatility
Effective for a wide range of instruments
Popularity
Higher bestseller rank at 8727
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone | Shure SM-57 Cardioid Dynamic Instrument Microphone |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Pattern | Cardioid | Cardioid |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz-18kHz | 40Hz-15kHz |
| Weight | 1.5 lbs | 0.5 lbs |
| Shock Mount | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Shure SM-57
When comparing the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure SM-57, the RE320 is positioned as a more specialized microphone, especially for broadcast and kick drum applications, while the SM-57 is a versatile choice suitable for a variety of instruments. The price difference is significant: the RE320 is priced at $315.00, whereas the SM-57 is about 69% cheaper at $98.00. This stark difference may influence your decision depending on your budget and specific needs.
Design and Build Quality
The Electro-Voice RE320 features a robust design tailored for professional use, emphasizing durability which is essential for studio and live settings. Its "Dual Personality" frequency response switch offers flexibility for different recording situations, particularly in achieving a punchy sound for kick drums. On the other hand, the Shure SM-57 is also known for its solid build quality, designed to withstand the rigors of performance and studio settings. The SM-57 provides a pneumatic shock mount system to reduce handling noise, making both microphones reliable choices in terms of construction.
Sound Quality
The RE320 is engineered to deliver exceptional sound quality, particularly for vocals and drums, thanks to its dynamic cardioid design. With a tailored kick drum EQ, it provides a distinct punch suitable for bass-heavy recordings. Conversely, the Shure SM-57 is praised for its clean reproduction of both amplified and acoustic instruments, featuring a contoured frequency response that enhances vocal pickup while minimizing background noise. Each microphone excels in its intended use, making the choice highly dependent on the specific audio requirements.
Versatility in Use
In terms of versatility, the Shure SM-57 stands out as it can be used effectively for a wide range of instruments, including guitars and brass, in addition to vocals. Its adaptability makes it a staple in many sound engineers' kits. The Electro-Voice RE320, while versatile, shines particularly in broadcast and kick drum scenarios. It’s designed for users who need that specialized sound for specific applications, which might limit its use in other contexts compared to the more general-purpose SM-57.
Pricing and Value
The pricing for these microphones reflects their target markets and applications. The Electro-Voice RE320 is priced at $315.00, making it a premium option aimed at professionals looking for specific features like the kick drum EQ. In contrast, the Shure SM-57, priced at $98.00, offers substantial value for those needing a reliable microphone for various musical applications. The RE320 is about 69% more expensive than the SM-57, a significant factor for budget-conscious buyers.
Sales Performance
When looking at sales performance, the Shure SM-57 has a notably higher bestseller rank at 8727 compared to the Electro-Voice RE320's rank of 76619. This suggests that the SM-57 is more popular among consumers, likely due to its lower price point and versatility, making it a preferred choice for many musicians and audio professionals.
User Experience and Feedback
Users often praise the Electro-Voice RE320 for its superior sound quality and versatility in specific situations, particularly in broadcasting and drumming. However, some might find it less practical for everyday use compared to the Shure SM-57. The SM-57 is frequently highlighted for its reliability and effectiveness across various instruments, which contributes to its positive reception. For those who need a dependable, all-around microphone, customer feedback often leans towards the SM-57.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure SM-57 comes down to your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a high-quality microphone specifically designed for broadcast or kick drum applications and are willing to invest, the RE320 is an excellent choice. However, if you need a versatile and budget-friendly microphone that performs well across a variety of scenarios, the Shure SM-57 is hard to beat with its lower price point and solid sales performance. Consider your recording environment and intended use to make the best decision for your audio needs.

