Fiskars Push Mower, Cut Width Manual Reel Mower vs Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower
Updated July 2026 — Fiskars Push Mower, Cut Width Manual Reel Mower wins on maneuverability and maintenance, Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower wins on weight and blade count.
The Fiskars Push Mower excels in cutting performance and ergonomics, while the Scotts mower is a more budget-friendly option.
Why Fiskars Push Mower, Cut Width Manual Reel Mower is better
Cutting Power
Fiskars offers twice the cutting power of standard reel mowers.
Ergonomics
Fiskars is 60% easier to push than other reel mowers.
Low Maintenance
Fiskars eliminates the need for manual blade sharpening.
Why Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower is better
Price
Scotts is approximately 44% less expensive.
Weight
Scotts is lightweight and easy to operate.
Assembly
Scotts is easy to assemble.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Fiskars Push Mower, Cut Width Manual Reel Mower | Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $266.85 | $149.99 |
| Cutting Height | 1"-4" | 1"-3" |
| Ergonomics | Superior | Good |
| Cutting System | StaySharp | 7-Blade |
| Grass Types | All types | Standard |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Fiskars Push Mower and Scotts Push Manual Reel Mower
When comparing the Fiskars Push Mower and the Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower, one key difference is their prices. The Fiskars model retails for $266.85, while the Scotts mower is significantly more affordable at $149.99, making it about 44% less expensive. Both mowers serve the eco-friendly market by eliminating the need for gas or electricity, but they differ in features and performance.
Cutting Performance
The Fiskars Push Mower boasts advanced InertiaDrive technology, offering twice the cutting power of standard reel mowers. Its StaySharp Cutting System eliminates the need for manual blade sharpening, making it a low-maintenance option. In contrast, the Scotts mower features a 7-blade ball bearing reel that promotes a clean cut without shredding the grass, similar to scissors. This ensures that the grass retains vital fluids, promoting a healthier lawn. Both mowers have an 18-inch cutting width, but the Fiskars is designed for more robust cutting performance, making it suitable for tougher grass types.
Ergonomics and Usability
In terms of ergonomics, the Fiskars Push Mower offers superior features such as a reversible grass chute and one-touch handle height adjustment, enhancing user comfort and control. Its design makes it 60% easier to push than other reel mowers, which is a notable benefit for those tackling larger lawns. On the other hand, the Scotts mower features a comfortable handle with a cushioned grip, ensuring ease of operation. While both mowers are user-friendly, the Fiskars model takes the lead with its additional ergonomic features.
Maintenance and Care
The Fiskars Push Mower requires minimal maintenance due to its StaySharp Cutting System, which eliminates manual blade sharpening altogether. This feature is particularly appealing for those looking for a hassle-free mowing experience. Conversely, the Scotts mower, while also low-maintenance, relies on quality heat-treated alloy steel blades that stay sharp longer but may still require occasional sharpening. For users prioritizing low maintenance, the Fiskars mower has a clear advantage.
Weight and Maneuverability
Both mowers are designed to be lightweight and easy to maneuver. The Fiskars Push Mower, with its advanced design, is engineered to be 60% easier to push compared to traditional reel mowers, making it ideal for users who may struggle with heavier equipment. The Scotts mower is also lightweight and easy to assemble, but it does not emphasize ease of pushing to the same extent. If maneuverability is a top concern, the Fiskars model stands out as the more user-friendly option.
Grass Types and Cutting Heights
The Fiskars Push Mower is versatile enough to handle various grass types, including tough southern varieties like St. Augustine and Bermuda, with adjustable cut heights ranging from 1 to 4 inches. This adaptability makes it suitable for a broader range of lawn conditions. The Scotts mower, however, offers an adjustable cutting height of 1 to 3 inches, which may limit its versatility for those with specific grass types. Users looking for a mower that can tackle diverse grass conditions may find the Fiskars model more appealing.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two mowers is substantial, with the Fiskars Push Mower priced at $266.85 and the Scotts mower at $149.99. This makes the Scotts mower approximately 44% less expensive. While the Fiskars model offers advanced features and cutting performance, the Scotts mower provides a budget-friendly option for eco-conscious consumers. The choice between price and features will ultimately depend on individual priorities.
Which should you buy?
If you prioritize cutting performance, ergonomics, and low maintenance, the Fiskars Push Mower is an excellent choice despite its higher price point. Its advanced features and superior cutting power make it ideal for a range of lawn conditions. However, if budget is a primary concern and you seek a reliable, eco-friendly mower, the Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower offers solid performance at a significantly lower price. Your decision should hinge on whether you value premium features or cost-effective solutions.

