Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface vs Motu M2 2x2 USB-C Audio Interface with XLR-XLR Cable Bundle
Updated August 2026 — Motu M2 2x2 USB-C Audio Interface with XLR-XLR Cable Bundle leads on latency and headphone output.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers great value for beginners, while the Motu M2 excels in sound quality and advanced features.
Why Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface is better
Price
Scarlett Solo is $19.96 cheaper.
Portability
Scarlett Solo is more compact and user-friendly.
Software
Includes Pro Tools Artist and a comprehensive plugin bundle.
Why Motu M2 2x2 USB-C Audio Interface with XLR-XLR Cable Bundle is better
Sound Quality
Motu M2 features ESS Sabre32 DAC technology.
Monitoring
Motu M2 has a full-color LCD for level monitoring.
Dynamic Range
Both have 120 dB, but M2 has superior preamp performance.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface | Motu M2 2x2 USB-C Audio Interface with XLR-XLR Cable Bundle |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Range | 120 dB | 120 dB |
| EIN | -129 dBu | -129 dBu |
| Inputs | 2 | 2 |
| Latency | N/A | 2.5 ms |
| Headphone Output | Standard | ESS-driven |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and Motu M2
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo is priced at $179.99, making it about 10% cheaper than the Motu M2, which is listed at $199.95. Both audio interfaces offer unique features that cater to different user needs, but they also share similarities that make them attractive options for musicians and creators alike. The Scarlett Solo is designed for simplicity and portability, while the Motu M2 emphasizes high-quality sound reproduction.
Sound Quality Comparison
When it comes to sound quality, both interfaces promise impressive specifications. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo boasts a dynamic range of up to 120 dB, thanks to its upgraded 24-bit/192 kHz AD/DA converters. This ensures professional-grade audio capture for recording, podcasting, and streaming. Meanwhile, the Motu M2 also features a 120 dB dynamic range, but it uses ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC technology, often found in higher-end audio interfaces. This technology offers superb analog sound and enables the M2 to deliver a measured -129 dBu EIN on mic inputs, which is an indicator of its ultra-clean preamp circuits.
Build Quality and Design
Both the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and Motu M2 are designed for durability and portability, making them ideal for on-the-go recordings. The Scarlett Solo is compact and easy to use, designed specifically for singer-songwriters who need to record vocals and instruments simultaneously. On the other hand, the Motu M2 features a full-color LCD that provides detailed level meters for all inputs and outputs, which adds a layer of functionality that can be particularly beneficial when monitoring levels during recording sessions. This feature sets it apart in terms of user experience, especially for those who prioritize precision in their recordings.
Included Software and Features
The bundled software packages highlight a significant difference between the two audio interfaces. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo comes with industry-standard recording software such as Pro Tools Artist and Ableton Live Lite, along with a comprehensive collection of plugins, including Auto-Tune Access for vocals. This is particularly appealing for those looking to start recording right out of the box. Conversely, the Motu M2 includes MOTU Performer Lite and also offers over 100 instruments and 6 GB of free loops and sample packs. While both interfaces provide valuable software, the choice may depend on individual preferences for specific software tools.
Connectivity Options
Both interfaces feature USB-C connectivity, ensuring fast and reliable data transfer. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo has a straightforward design with two inputs (one microphone and one instrument), making it easy to set up and use. The Motu M2, however, offers a 2x2 channel configuration, which gives users more flexibility for connecting multiple audio sources. This added versatility allows for more complex setups, making the Motu M2 a better choice for those who need to record more than just a single instrument or vocal track.
Target Audience
The Scarlett Solo is particularly well-suited for singer-songwriters and podcasters who require a simple yet effective recording solution. Its user-friendly design ensures that even beginners can start recording music or podcasts quickly. In contrast, the Motu M2 is geared towards professionals and serious hobbyists who demand high-quality audio and additional features like low-latency monitoring and detailed level meters. The Motu M2's advanced specifications make it a strong contender for users looking for a more sophisticated audio interface.
Price and Value for Money
With the Focusrite Scarlett Solo priced at $179.99 and the Motu M2 at $199.95, the difference of $19.96 means the Scarlett Solo is about 10% cheaper. While the Scarlett Solo offers great value for those who prioritize ease of use and portability, the Motu M2 justifies its higher price with its superior sound quality and advanced features, appealing to users who are willing to invest in a higher-end interface.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and the Motu M2 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are a beginner or a singer-songwriter looking for an affordable and user-friendly interface, the Scarlett Solo is a fantastic choice that offers excellent sound quality and a comprehensive software bundle. However, if you are a more experienced user seeking the best possible sound quality and advanced features, the Motu M2 is worth the extra investment, providing superior performance and functionality.

