Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface vs Yamaha 2-in/2-out USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface with
Updated August 2026 — Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface wins on ease of use and price, Yamaha 2-in/2-out USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface with wins on connectivity and build.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers a more budget-friendly option with high-quality sound, while the Yamaha URX22C provides advanced features and flexibility. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface is better
Price
Focusrite is cheaper by $7
Simplicity
Easier setup for beginners
Dynamic Range
Higher dynamic range at 120 dB
Why Yamaha 2-in/2-out USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface with is better
DSP Features
Includes DSP-powered monitoring and effects
MIDI Support
Offers MIDI I/O for more versatility
Durability
Rugged full-metal housing for road use
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface | Yamaha 2-in/2-out USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface with |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Range | 120 dB | Not specified |
| Sample Rate | 192 kHz | 192 kHz |
| Inputs | 2 | 2 |
| MIDI I/O | No | Yes |
| Software Bundle | Pro Tools, Ableton | Cubase AI |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and Yamaha URX22C
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo is priced at $179.99, making it about 9% cheaper than the Yamaha URX22C at $186.99. Both interfaces target musicians and content creators, but they offer different features that appeal to various needs. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo emphasizes simplicity and high-quality sound for recording, while the Yamaha URX22C provides extensive DSP-powered mixing capabilities and a robust software suite.
Sound Quality
Sound quality is a critical factor for any audio interface, and both the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and Yamaha URX22C deliver impressive performance. The Scarlett Solo boasts a dynamic range of up to 120 dB, equipping it with studio-quality converters found in high-end professional setups. In contrast, the Yamaha URX22C offers 32-bit integer and 192 kHz support, ensuring clear audio capture and playback. While both interfaces promise high fidelity, the Scarlett Solo's emphasis on dynamic range may appeal more to those primarily focused on vocal and instrument recording.
Connectivity Options
When it comes to connectivity, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo provides two inputs: one for a microphone and one for an instrument, ideal for solo performers. It features ultra-low-noise preamps that enhance sound quality. On the other hand, the Yamaha URX22C offers two combo inputs that support XLR and TRS connections, making it more versatile for connecting various audio sources. Additionally, the Yamaha includes MIDI I/O, which is beneficial for musicians using MIDI instruments. Thus, users looking for more input options may prefer the Yamaha over the Focusrite.
Design and Build Quality
The design and build quality of both audio interfaces cater to different preferences. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo has a compact and portable design, making it suitable for musicians on the go. It is user-friendly, ensuring quick setup without a steep learning curve. Conversely, the Yamaha URX22C features a rugged full-metal housing, emphasizing durability for road use. This makes it a solid choice for performers who require reliability during live events. Ultimately, the choice depends on whether portability or durability is more important to the user.
Software and Compatibility
Software comes as a significant advantage with both interfaces, but they cater to different user needs. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo includes a comprehensive recording toolkit featuring Pro Tools Artist, Ableton Live Lite, and a full collection of plugins, including Auto-Tune Access. This extensive package is perfect for musicians looking to record, mix, and master their music efficiently. Meanwhile, the Yamaha URX22C is bundled with the Steinberg software suite, including Cubase AI and a dspMixFx application, offering DSP-powered monitoring and effects. Users who prioritize high-level mixing capabilities may find the Yamaha's software suite more aligned with their requirements.
Price Comparison
The pricing of both products reflects their positioning in the market. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo is currently priced at $179.99, making it a more budget-friendly option compared to the Yamaha URX22C, which retails for $186.99. This difference of about $7 highlights the Scarlett Solo's appeal for those seeking a high-quality interface without breaking the bank. However, the investment in the Yamaha may be justified for users seeking advanced features and extensive software support.
Target Audience
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo is primarily aimed at singer-songwriters and podcasters who need a straightforward interface for recording vocals and instruments. It excels in simplicity and quality, making it perfect for those who want to get started quickly without a steep learning curve. Conversely, the Yamaha URX22C is designed for musicians and content creators who require more flexibility with inputs and effects. With its DSP capabilities and MIDI support, it caters to a broader audience, including those who engage in live performances and complex mixing tasks.
Customer Reception
Customer reception can provide insights into the usability and effectiveness of these products. The Focusrite Scarlett Solo holds a sales rank of 4258, indicating a strong presence in the market. Meanwhile, the Yamaha URX22C has a sales rank of 5030, suggesting that while it is also well-received, it may not have reached the same level of popularity. This difference in sales rank could imply that the Focusrite is a more trusted option among users looking for reliability and quality in their audio interface.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and the Yamaha URX22C ultimately depends on your specific needs as a user. If you prioritize a budget-friendly interface with high-quality sound and ease of use, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is the better option for you. However, if you need greater flexibility, advanced mixing capabilities, and a robust software package, the Yamaha URX22C would be the right choice. Both interfaces serve their target audiences well, but understanding your requirements will help you make the best decision.

