GEEKOM AX8 Max Mini PC with AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS vs KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U ,
Updated August 2026 — GEEKOM AX8 Max Mini PC with AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS wins on graphics and storage, KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U , wins on price.
The GEEKOM AX8 Max Mini PC outperforms the KAMRUI Pinova P1 in processing power and features, making it the better choice for demanding tasks.
Why GEEKOM AX8 Max Mini PC with AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS is better
Performance
Superior AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS processor
Memory
32GB DDR5 RAM vs 16GB DDR4 RAM
Graphics
Dedicated Radeon 780M graphics
Why KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U , is better
Price
Significantly lower price at $319.99
Compactness
More portable design
Basic Use
Adequate for everyday tasks
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | GEEKOM AX8 Max Mini PC with AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS | KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U , |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS | AMD Ryzen 4300U |
| RAM | 32GB DDR5 | 16GB DDR4 |
| Storage | 1TB NVMe SSD | 256GB SSD |
| Graphics | Radeon 780M | Integrated |
| Price | $749.00 | $319.99 |
Dimension comparison
Design and Build Quality
The GEEKOM AX8 Max Mini PC features an aircraft-grade aluminum alloy frame, providing a robust yet lightweight design. In contrast, the KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC offers a compact powerhouse design that emphasizes portability. Both mini PCs are designed for efficiency and performance, but the premium materials of the GEEKOM AX8 Max may appeal more to users looking for durability and style.
The GEEKOM AX8 Max's aesthetic is complemented by its advanced cooling system, which ensures performance stability during demanding tasks. The KAMRUI Pinova P1, while also efficient, focuses on a more traditional mini PC look, suitable for various environments, whether at home or in an office.
Performance
In terms of processing power, the GEEKOM AX8 Max is equipped with an AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, which provides superior performance compared to the KAMRUI Pinova P1's AMD Ryzen 4300U. The Ryzen 7 processor is designed for high-intensity tasks, making it ideal for video editing and gaming, where it truly excels.
The GEEKOM AX8 Max can handle AAA gaming and heavy rendering tasks, while the KAMRUI Pinova P1, with its Ryzen 4300U, is more suited for light multitasking and basic 3D rendering. This clear distinction highlights the GEEKOM's edge in performance, making it a better choice for users who require more horsepower for demanding applications.
Memory and Storage
When it comes to memory and storage, the GEEKOM AX8 Max offers 32GB of upgradable DDR5 RAM and a 1TB NVMe SSD, ensuring ample space for applications and files. The KAMRUI Pinova P1, on the other hand, features 16GB of DDR4 RAM and a 256GB SSD. While the KAMRUI can be expanded, it starts with significantly less capacity.
The difference in memory size (32GB vs. 16GB) indicates that the GEEKOM AX8 Max is better suited for multitasking and running multiple applications simultaneously without lag. Users who frequently work with large files or run intensive software will benefit from the expanded capabilities of the GEEKOM model.
Connectivity Options
The GEEKOM AX8 Max is equipped with dual 2.5GbE LAN ports, USB4.0, and support for quad display, making it ideal for users who require extensive connectivity options. Meanwhile, the KAMRUI Pinova P1 supports triple 4K displays but lacks the same high-speed LAN capabilities.
The dual 2.5GbE LAN ports of the GEEKOM provide faster internet speeds for gaming and large file transfers, making it a preferred option for tech enthusiasts and professionals needing reliable network performance. The KAMRUI's connectivity, while adequate for general use, may fall short for users with high bandwidth demands.
Graphics Performance
For graphics, the GEEKOM AX8 Max comes with Radeon 780M graphics, which enables it to handle gaming and graphic-intensive tasks smoothly. In contrast, the KAMRUI Pinova P1 utilizes integrated graphics that are sufficient for everyday tasks but do not match the performance levels of dedicated graphics found in the GEEKOM.
This distinction is crucial for users interested in gaming or graphic design, as the GEEKOM AX8 Max can support demanding applications without compromising on visual quality. The KAMRUI, while able to manage basic multimedia content, does not cater to high-end gaming or graphics work.
Price Comparison
The GEEKOM AX8 Max is priced at $749.00, while the KAMRUI Pinova P1 is significantly cheaper at $319.99—about 57% less expensive. This substantial price difference reflects the performance and feature disparity between the two models.
For users on a budget or those who do not require the high-end specifications of the GEEKOM AX8 Max, the KAMRUI Pinova P1 offers a cost-effective solution. However, for professionals or gamers who need robust performance, the investment in the GEEKOM model may be justified.
Target Audience
The GEEKOM AX8 Max is tailored for power users, gamers, and professionals in creative fields requiring extensive computing power. Its high-end specifications make it ideal for tasks like video editing, gaming, and multitasking across multiple applications.
Conversely, the KAMRUI Pinova P1 is suitable for casual users, students, and those needing a reliable home or office PC for basic tasks such as web browsing, document editing, and media consumption. Its lower price point makes it an attractive option for those with less demanding computing needs.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the GEEKOM AX8 Max and the KAMRUI Pinova P1 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you require a powerful mini PC for gaming, video editing, or other intensive tasks, the GEEKOM AX8 Max, with its superior performance, extensive connectivity options, and higher memory capacity, is the clear winner. However, if your computing needs are more basic and budget is a primary concern, the KAMRUI Pinova P1 offers a solid performance at a significantly lower price point, making it an excellent choice for everyday users.

