Makita CT232 CXT 12V Max Lithium-Ion Cordless vs Milwaukee Electric Tools 2598-22 M12 Fuel 2 Pc
Updated July 2026 — full head-to-head comparison.
Overview of the Makita CT232 and Milwaukee 2598-22
The Makita CT232 is priced at $169.00, making it about 42% cheaper than the Milwaukee 2598-22, which retails for $290.00. Both tools are part of the 12V class, aimed at providing compact and efficient drilling and impact driving solutions. The Makita combo kit includes a driver-drill and an impact driver, while the Milwaukee kit features a hammer drill and an impact driver. Both kits are designed for different applications, making them suitable for various users, from DIY enthusiasts to professionals.
Performance Comparison
When it comes to performance, the Makita CT232 features a 3/8" driver-drill that delivers up to 250 in.lbs. of max torque, with speeds of 0-450 and 0-1,700 RPM. In contrast, the Milwaukee 2598-22 boasts a 1/2" hammer drill, but exact torque specifications are not provided. However, it is known to be the lightest and most compact hammer drill in the market, weighing only 2.8 lbs. Both products offer impressive performance, but the Makita provides explicit torque figures that may be crucial for users requiring specific capabilities.
Design and Ergonomics
The Makita CT232 is designed to be compact, weighing just 2.4 lbs. for the driver-drill and 2.3 lbs. for the impact driver. This lightweight design reduces operator fatigue during extended use. The Milwaukee 2598-22, while also compact, comes in at 2.8 lbs. for the hammer drill. Both tools feature ergonomic designs, but the Makita’s slightly lighter weight may give it an edge for users prioritizing ease of handling.
Battery Life and Charging
Battery life is crucial for cordless tools, and both the Makita CT232 and Milwaukee 2598-22 come with lithium-ion batteries. The Makita kit includes two 12V max CXT Lithium-Ion 1.5Ah batteries. The Milwaukee kit features a 4.0 XC battery and a 2.0 XC battery, providing users with a variety of power options. While the Makita's batteries are designed for superior balance, Milwaukee's 4.0 XC battery offers a longer run time, making it a better choice for users requiring extended periods of operation.
Versatility and Application
In terms of versatility, the Makita CT232 is tailored for drilling, driving, and fastening applications, making it suitable for a range of tasks. The impact driver of the Makita offers variable speed up to 2,600 RPM and 3,500 IPM, allowing for efficient driving in various materials. The Milwaukee 2598-22 is equipped with a hammer drill that excels in compact spaces and features a four-mode drive control for the impact driver, enhancing its versatility for different applications. Depending on the user’s needs, each kit offers unique advantages.
User Experience and Feedback
The Makita CT232 has a bestseller rank of 160,570, indicating a decent level of popularity among users. Feedback often highlights its compact design and ease of use. The Milwaukee 2598-22, with a better sales rank of 132,976, suggests it may have a stronger following and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate its compact size and powerful capabilities, which may influence purchasing decisions.
Price vs. Value
At $169.00, the Makita CT232 offers a significant price advantage, being approximately 42% less expensive than the Milwaukee 2598-22, priced at $290.00. This price difference may appeal to budget-conscious users who still want reliable performance. However, the Milwaukee kit's higher price may reflect its advanced features and battery options, potentially offering better long-term value for frequent users or professionals.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Makita CT232 and the Milwaukee 2598-22 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a more affordable option with solid performance in drilling and driving tasks, the Makita CT232 is an excellent choice. On the other hand, if you require a more robust hammer drill with advanced features and a higher battery capacity, the Milwaukee 2598-22 may justify its higher price. Both tools are well-suited for their intended applications, ensuring satisfaction regardless of your choice.

