Makita CX205RB 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Sub-Compact vs Milwaukee Electric Tools 2719-21 M18 Fuel Hackzall Kit
Updated July 2026 — Makita CX205RB 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Sub-Compact wins on price and rpm, Milwaukee Electric Tools 2719-21 M18 Fuel Hackzall Kit wins on stroke and length.
The Makita CX205RB offers superior versatility and features, while the Milwaukee 2719-21 excels in cutting speed and affordability.
Why Makita CX205RB 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Sub-Compact is better
Versatility
Makita is a combo kit for various tasks.
Torque
Makita delivers 350 in.lbs. of peak torque.
Battery Tech
Makita features Star Protection for battery longevity.
Why Milwaukee Electric Tools 2719-21 M18 Fuel Hackzall Kit is better
Price
Milwaukee is priced at $199.99.
Cutting Speed
Milwaukee cuts up to 50% faster.
Sales Rank
Milwaukee has a higher sales rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Makita CX205RB 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Sub-Compact | Milwaukee Electric Tools 2719-21 M18 Fuel Hackzall Kit |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Makita | Milwaukee |
| Type | Combo Kit | Recip Saw |
| Battery | 18V LXT | M18 REDLITHIUM |
| Speed | 1700 RPM | N/A |
| Vibration | N/A | 4x lower |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Makita CX205RB is priced at $249.00, while the Milwaukee Electric Tools 2719-21 is available for $199.99. This makes the Milwaukee model about 17% cheaper than the Makita option. Despite the price difference, both products offer unique advantages that may appeal to different users. The Milwaukee tool's lower price point might attract budget-conscious buyers, while the Makita’s additional features and capabilities could justify its higher cost for those seeking enhanced performance.
Brand Reputation
Both Makita and Milwaukee are renowned brands in the power tool industry, recognized for their quality and reliability. Makita has built a strong reputation for producing durable and efficient tools, with the CX205RB combo kit reflecting this ethos through its advanced features like the brushless motor and compact design. On the other hand, Milwaukee is celebrated for its innovation, particularly with its M18 Fuel line, which includes powerful, efficient tools like the Hackzall. The Milwaukee tool, with its enhanced cutting capabilities, reinforces the brand's commitment to delivering performance.
Performance and Features
In terms of performance, the Makita CX205RB shines with its brushless motor that delivers 350 in.lbs. of peak torque and a maximum speed of 1,700 RPM. This makes it suitable for a variety of tasks, including drilling, fastening, and hammer drilling. The product’s compact design and lightweight construction (only 3.1 lbs. with battery) enhance user comfort during prolonged use. Conversely, the Milwaukee Electric Tools 2719-21 also boasts impressive performance, cutting up to 50% faster than its competitors. Its brushless motor and 7/8” stroke length ensure optimal cutting speed, making it ideal for tougher applications.
Design and Ergonomics
The design of the Makita CX205RB focuses on compactness and user comfort, measuring just 6-1/2” long. This ergonomic approach reduces operator fatigue, allowing users to work in tight spaces with ease. The lightweight nature of the tool further enhances its portability. In contrast, the Milwaukee Electric Tools 2719-21 features a one-handed design that facilitates superior control during cuts, especially in confined areas. The dual gear counterbalance mechanism also minimizes vibration, contributing to a smoother cutting experience and reducing user fatigue during extended tasks.
Battery Life and Charging
Battery performance is crucial in cordless tools, and both the Makita CX205RB and Milwaukee 2719-21 excel in this area. The Makita kit utilizes 18V LXT lithium-ion batteries, which are known for their fast charging capabilities, ensuring that users spend more time working and less time waiting. The inclusion of Star Protection Computer Controls™ in the Makita tool enhances battery life and performance by protecting against overload and overheating. Meanwhile, the Milwaukee Hackzall is powered by the M18 REDLITHIUM XC5.0 battery pack, offering longer work sessions per charge and increased durability over time. This specific battery technology allows for improved performance and productivity.
Versatility and Applications
The versatility of the Makita CX205RB makes it suitable for a wide range of applications. With its hammer driver-drill and impact driver components, it can tackle drilling into masonry, fastening, and general construction tasks with ease. The tool's variable-speed settings allow users to adapt to different materials and challenges. On the other hand, the Milwaukee Electric Tools 2719-21 is designed primarily for cutting, making it the fastest cutting one-handed reciprocating saw on the market. Its capabilities are particularly beneficial for those needing a tool for quick, precise cuts in metal or other materials, emphasizing its specialty in specific tasks.
Customer Ratings and Sales Rank
The Makita CX205RB has a bestseller rank of 137,904, whereas the Milwaukee Electric Tools 2719-21 enjoys a significantly higher rank of 52,489. This suggests that the Milwaukee model is more popular among consumers, potentially due to its competitive pricing and effective performance in cutting applications. Customer ratings can provide insights into user satisfaction and product reliability, with Milwaukee’s higher sales rank indicating that more users have chosen this product, likely due to its effectiveness and value proposition.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Makita CX205RB and the Milwaukee Electric Tools 2719-21 largely depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require a versatile combo kit for drilling and fastening tasks, the Makita offers robust features and superior ergonomics, although at a higher price of $249.00. Conversely, if you are looking for a powerful cutting tool that excels in speed and efficiency, the Milwaukee Hackzall at $199.99 might be the better option. Ultimately, your choice should align with your intended applications and the value you place on performance versus cost.

