Makita XT505 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Cordless 5-Pc. Combo Kit vs Milwaukee M12 12-Volt Lithium-Ion Cordless 3/8 in.
Updated July 2026 — Makita XT505 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Cordless 5-Pc. Combo Kit leads on rpm and torque.
The Makita XT505 offers superior versatility and performance, making it the better choice for demanding tasks, while the Milwaukee M12 is more affordable and suitable for lighter jobs.
Why Makita XT505 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Cordless 5-Pc. Combo Kit is better
Tool Range
Makita includes five tools compared to Milwaukee's two.
Torque
Makita's hammer driver-drill has 480 in.lbs. of torque.
Battery Life
Makita features faster-charging 3.0Ah batteries.
Why Milwaukee M12 12-Volt Lithium-Ion Cordless 3/8 in. is better
Price
Milwaukee is significantly cheaper at $179.
Portability
Milwaukee has a compact design for tight spaces.
Sales Rank
Milwaukee has a better sales rank at 73,147.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Makita XT505 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Cordless 5-Pc. Combo Kit | Milwaukee M12 12-Volt Lithium-Ion Cordless 3/8 in. |
|---|---|---|
| Max Torque | 480 in.lbs. | 35 ft-lbs |
| Max RPM | 1900 | 250 |
| Battery Type | 3.0Ah | 1.5Ah |
| Included Tools | 5 | 2 |
| Sales Rank | 106526 | 73147 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Makita XT505 and Milwaukee M12 Combo Kits
The Makita XT505 is priced at $559.00, while the Milwaukee M12 costs $179.00, making the Milwaukee kit approximately 68% cheaper. This significant price difference reflects the tools included and their intended uses. The Makita kit offers a broader range of tools, including a hammer driver-drill, impact driver, reciprocating saw, circular saw, and a flashlight, providing a versatile solution for various tasks. In contrast, the Milwaukee kit focuses on a ratchet and screwdriver, ideal for more specific fastening jobs. This overview highlights the different scopes and pricing of both combo kits.
Tool Versatility and Range
The Makita XT505 excels in versatility, offering five tools compared to Milwaukee's two. This includes a hammer driver-drill with a maximum torque of 480 in.lbs., an impact driver with 1,460 in.lbs. of torque, and a reciprocating saw capable of 2,800 strokes per minute. These features make the Makita kit suitable for a wide range of applications, from drilling to cutting. Conversely, the Milwaukee M12 combo focuses on a ratchet and a screwdriver, delivering up to 35 ft-lbs of torque and 250 RPM for efficient fastening. While both kits serve different purposes, the Makita's broader range gives it a distinct advantage for users requiring multifunctional tools.
Performance Capabilities
In terms of performance, the Makita XT505 outshines the Milwaukee M12 with its higher torque and speed ratings. The hammer driver-drill operates at two speeds, reaching 1,900 RPM, which is crucial for various drilling applications. The impact driver is notably powerful, delivering 1,460 in.lbs. of maximum torque. The Milwaukee M12, while effective for its intended tasks, operates at a maximum of 250 RPM, making it less suitable for heavy-duty jobs. The Makita kit's more robust specifications cater to demanding projects, while the Milwaukee kit is better suited for lighter, more specific tasks.
Battery Life and Charging
Battery performance is another area where the Makita XT505 stands out. It includes the fastest-charging 3.0Ah batteries in its category, ensuring minimal downtime during projects. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who rely on their tools for extended periods. The Milwaukee M12 comes with a 1.5Ah battery, which, while efficient, does not match the capacity of the Makita's batteries. The REDLITHIUM battery technology in the Milwaukee kit does provide longer work per charge, but the Makita's charging speed and battery life give it a competitive edge, especially for intensive tasks.
Design and Portability
The Milwaukee M12 boasts a compact design that enhances portability, making it ideal for tight spaces and easy transport. Its low-profile head design facilitates access to confined areas, which is a significant advantage for users working in limited spaces. In contrast, the Makita XT505 tools, while slightly bulkier due to their functionality, are still manageable. Users who prioritize portability may prefer the Milwaukee kit for its ease of use in cramped conditions. However, those needing a comprehensive toolset may find the size and weight of the Makita kit justified by its capabilities.
Target Audience
The target audiences for these kits differ considerably. The Makita XT505 is aimed at professionals or serious DIY enthusiasts who require a comprehensive set of tools for various tasks, from drilling to cutting. Its higher price point reflects the quality and versatility needed for demanding projects. On the other hand, the Milwaukee M12 is designed for casual users or professionals who frequently handle smaller fastening tasks. Its affordability and focus on specific tools make it an appealing choice for those who may not need the full range of capabilities offered by the Makita kit.
Sales Performance
In terms of sales rank, the Milwaukee M12 holds a better position at 73,147 compared to the Makita XT505 at 106,526. This suggests that the Milwaukee kit may be more popular among consumers, likely due to its lower price and targeted functionality. This popularity can also be indicative of broader market preferences, where users may gravitate towards more affordable, specialized tools rather than comprehensive, higher-priced kits. Despite the Makita's extensive capabilities, the Milwaukee's performance in the sales arena highlights consumer trends towards value and practicality.
Which should you buy?
When deciding between the Makita XT505 and the Milwaukee M12, consider your project needs and budget. The Makita XT505 is a robust option for those requiring a versatile toolset with high performance across various tasks, making it ideal for professionals or serious DIYers. However, at $179.00, the Milwaukee M12 offers a lower-priced solution that excels in specific fastening tasks, catering to casual users or those with lighter workloads. Ultimately, your choice will depend on the balance between tool versatility and budget constraints.

