vsversusfinder

Nikon NIKKOR Z vs Viltrox

Updated July 2026 — Nikon NIKKOR Z wins on autofocus and build, Viltrox wins on price and weight.

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 offers superior video capabilities and background blur, while the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E excels in low-light performance and portability at a lower price.

Why Nikon NIKKOR Z is better

Video Features

Nikon's autofocus minimizes focus breathing.

Background Blur

Nikon's 9 blade diaphragm enhances bokeh.

Build Quality

Nikon lens is compact and versatile.

Why Viltrox is better

Price

Viltrox is 35% cheaper.

Low-Light

Viltrox has a brighter f/1.7 aperture.

Weight

Viltrox is lighter at 170g.

Overall score

Nikon NIKKOR Z
85
Viltrox
78

Specifications

SpecNikon NIKKOR ZViltrox
Max Aperturef/2f/1.7
Focal Length40mm35mm
Camera MountNikon ZSony E
WeightN/A170g
AutofocusYesYes

Dimension comparison

Nikon NIKKOR ZViltrox

Overview

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is priced at $276.95, while the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E is about 35% cheaper at $179.00. Both lenses cater to different camera systems and shooting styles, making them appealing to distinct types of photographers. The Nikon lens is designed for the Z series mirrorless cameras, while the Viltrox lens is compatible with Sony E mount cameras, highlighting a fundamental difference in their intended user base.

Lens Compatibility

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is compatible with FX and DX format Nikon Z series mirrorless cameras, offering versatility for various shooting scenarios. On DX-format cameras, the lens provides a field of view equivalent to 60mm, making it suitable for both portrait and landscape photography. In contrast, the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E is tailored for APS-C-format E-mount mirrorless cameras, giving a 35mm equivalent focal length. This difference in compatibility means that your choice will depend heavily on your camera system, as each lens is optimized for its respective mounts.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E boasts a bright maximum aperture of f/1.7, which excels in low-light conditions and allows for greater control over depth of field. This makes it particularly suitable for portrait photography and environments where light is limited. In comparison, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2, while still fast, has a slightly narrower maximum aperture. The f/2 aperture provides good low-light performance, but it does not quite match the capabilities of the Viltrox lens, especially for photographers who prioritize shooting in dim settings.

Autofocus Features

Both lenses offer autofocus capabilities, but their systems differ in design and performance. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 features a fast and quiet autofocus system that minimizes focus breathing, making it an excellent choice for video recording. It also includes a custom control ring that allows for precise manual focusing or adjustments to aperture, ISO, or exposure compensation. The Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E, while also offering near-silent autofocus, does not mention focus breathing suppression. This could affect video shooters who prioritize smooth focus transitions, giving the edge to the Nikon lens in this category.

Build and Design

The build quality of both lenses reflects their intended use, but they differ in weight and design. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is compact and lightweight, making it a great travel companion. However, the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E is even lighter at just 170g, making it exceptionally portable for everyday use and travel. This reduction in weight can make a significant difference for photographers who frequently carry their gear for long periods. Both lenses are designed with user comfort in mind, but the Viltrox may appeal more to those who prioritize a lightweight setup.

Creative Versatility

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is versatile enough for various creative endeavors, such as street photography, landscapes, and portraits, thanks to its focal length and shallow depth of field. Its ability to create a natural bokeh effect with its 9 rounded blade diaphragm enhances background blur, making it an excellent choice for artistic shots. On the other hand, the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E excels in both portrait and landscape photography, emphasizing its suitability for a wide range of shooting styles. Photographers who value the ability to switch between different genres may find both lenses appealing, but the Nikon's unique features could provide an edge for portraiture.

Price Considerations

The price difference between the two lenses is notable; the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is priced at $276.95, while the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E is available for $179.00. This makes the Viltrox about 35% less expensive than the Nikon lens. For budget-conscious photographers or those who are just starting, the Viltrox offers a compelling option without compromising too much on performance. However, the additional features and build quality of the Nikon lens may justify its higher price for serious enthusiasts or professionals.

User Experience and Practicality

Both lenses are designed to enhance the user experience, yet their practical applications may differ based on the photographer's needs. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2, with its customizable control ring and fast autofocus, appeals to those who enjoy manual adjustments and video shooting. Meanwhile, the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E supports EXIF information transmission, making it more integrated with modern camera systems, which can enhance the shooting experience. Depending on your usage patterns, one lens may feel more intuitive and practical than the other.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 and the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E ultimately comes down to your camera system and specific photography needs. If you own a Nikon Z series camera and seek a versatile lens with exceptional background blur and video capabilities, the Nikon lens is a solid investment. However, if you use a Sony E mount camera and prioritize low-light performance and portability at a lower price point, the Viltrox lens is an excellent choice. Both lenses offer unique advantages, making them worthwhile options in their respective categories.