vsversusfinder

Tamron vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — Tamron wins on aperture, VILTROX wins on weight and elements.

Winner

The Tamron 24mm lens offers excellent versatility and value, while the VILTROX excels in portrait photography with its bokeh capabilities.

Why Tamron is better

Price

Tamron is $199, which is cheaper than VILTROX at $275.

Weight

Tamron weighs 7.6oz, lighter than VILTROX at 360g.

Close Focus

Tamron has a minimum focus distance of 4.7 inches.

Why VILTROX is better

Bokeh

VILTROX's F2.0 aperture creates stunning background blur.

Autofocus

VILTROX features a Stepping Motor for smooth autofocus.

Optical Design

VILTROX has 10 elements for superior sharpness and color accuracy.

Overall score

Tamron
85
VILTROX
90

Specifications

SpecTamronVILTROX
Price$199.00$275.00
Max Mag.1:2N/A
Moisture Res.YesNo
BokehModerateStrong
AutofocusStandardAdvanced

Dimension comparison

TamronVILTROX

Overview of the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 Lens and VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 Lens is priced at $199.00, while the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens is available for $275.00, making the Tamron lens about 27.5% cheaper. This price difference is significant for photographers on a budget. Each lens serves distinct purposes: the Tamron is designed for wide-angle photography, ideal for landscapes and urban scenes, while the VILTROX targets portrait photographers with its longer focal length and bokeh capabilities.

Design and Build Quality

The Tamron lens boasts a compact and lightweight design, measuring only 2.5 inches in length and weighing 7.6 ounces. This makes it an excellent option for photographers who prefer portability without sacrificing quality. In contrast, the VILTROX lens, although heavier at 360 grams, is still quite portable and ergonomic, with dimensions of φ69mm x 78mm. Both lenses are engineered for outdoor use, but the Tamron features Moisture-Resistant Construction and a Fluorine Coating to resist dirt, giving it an edge in challenging environments.

Optical Performance

When it comes to optical performance, the Tamron lens offers a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2, allowing for impressive macro-style shots, while maintaining sharpness across the frame. It utilizes special glass materials, including Low Dispersion and Glass Molded Aspherical lens elements, to minimize aberrations. The VILTROX lens, with its 10 elements in 8 groups, focuses on color accuracy and sharpness, thanks to its Extra-low Dispersion elements. Both lenses excel in their categories, but the Tamron provides unique close-up capabilities that the VILTROX does not.

Focusing and Autofocus Capabilities

The autofocus performance differs significantly between the two lenses. The VILTROX features a Stepping Motor (STM) for smooth and quiet autofocus, making it particularly suitable for both photography and video. This lens has a minimum focusing distance of 0.74 meters, allowing for beautiful close-up shots. On the other hand, the Tamron lens has a minimum object distance of only 4.7 inches (0.12 meters), enabling even closer shots. While both lenses offer solid autofocus, the Tamron's close-focusing ability is a unique selling point for macro enthusiasts.

Use Cases and Versatility

The Tamron 24mm lens is highly versatile, being ideal for various shooting styles, including landscape, urban photography, and candid snapshots. Its wide-angle field of view lets photographers capture expansive scenery effectively. Conversely, the VILTROX lens is tailored specifically for portrait photography, with its F2.0 aperture providing strong background blur for professional-looking images. Each lens is designed for different photography needs, making the choice largely dependent on the photographer's primary focus.

Price and Value for Money

At $199.00, the Tamron lens offers excellent value, especially considering its features and versatility. In comparison, the VILTROX is priced at $275.00, which is approximately 38% more expensive. This price difference can be justified if portrait photography is the primary focus, given the VILTROX's specialized features. However, for those seeking a general-purpose lens that performs well in various conditions, the Tamron provides a compelling argument for its lower price point.

User Experience and Feedback

While user feedback is not provided in the data, the specifications suggest that both lenses are designed with user experience in mind. The Tamron's lightweight design makes it suitable for long shooting sessions without fatigue, while the VILTROX's advanced autofocus system may appeal to those who prioritize ease of use. Both brands have established reputations in the photography community, which can influence user satisfaction and trust.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 Lens and the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens ultimately depends on your photographic needs. If you're looking for a versatile, lightweight lens for landscapes and everyday photography, the Tamron is a more budget-friendly option at $199.00. However, if you specialize in portrait photography and want a lens that offers stunning bokeh and sharpness, the VILTROX, despite its higher price of $275.00, may be worth the investment. Consider your photography style and budget carefully to make the best choice.