vsversusfinder

VILTROX vs VILTROX AF

Updated July 2026 — VILTROX wins on price and portability, VILTROX AF wins on build and autofocus.

Winner

The VILTROX 25mm f1.7 offers excellent value and portability for Sony users, while the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 excels in image quality for Nikon users.

Why VILTROX is better

Price

25mm is significantly cheaper at $176.00

Weight

25mm is lighter at 170g

Versatility

25mm is suitable for various photography styles

Why VILTROX AF is better

Image Quality

16mm has superior optical design with ED elements

Autofocus

16mm features fast and quiet autofocus

Ultra-wide

16mm is ideal for landscapes and architecture

Overall score

VILTROX
75
VILTROX AF
85

Specifications

SpecVILTROXVILTROX AF
Aperturef1.7f1.8
CompatibilitySony E-MountNikon Z-Mount
Elements12 elements7 elements
Max Focus0.25m0.27m
LCD DisplayNoYes

Dimension comparison

VILTROXVILTROX AF

Overview

When it comes to choosing between the VILTROX 25mm f1.7 E-Mount Large Aperture STM APS-C Auto Focus Prime Lens and the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z Full Frame Lens, the decision largely hinges on your camera system and photography needs. The 25mm lens is priced at $176.00, making it about 69% cheaper than the 16mm lens, which is listed at $580.00. This significant price difference may influence your choice if budget is a primary concern.

Compatibility

The VILTROX 25mm lens is designed specifically for Sony E-Mount cameras, including popular models like the A7C and A7RIV. On the other hand, the VILTROX AF 16mm lens is compatible with Nikon Z-Mount mirrorless cameras, such as the Z9 and Z7II. If you own a Nikon camera, the 16mm lens is your only option, whereas Sony users will benefit from the range of features offered by the 25mm lens. This compatibility factor is crucial, as it dictates which lens will work seamlessly with your camera body.

Aperture and Image Quality

Both lenses boast impressive apertures, but they serve different purposes. The VILTROX 25mm features a maximum aperture of f1.7, which allows for beautiful natural bokeh and artistic blur effects that effectively highlight subjects. In contrast, the VILTROX AF 16mm has a maximum aperture of f1.8 and is designed for ultra-wide-angle shots, making it ideal for landscapes and architecture. Moreover, the 16mm lens employs advanced optical technology, including three aspherical elements and four ED glass elements, which collectively enhance image quality and minimize color bleeding. This distinction in aperture and optical design makes each lens suitable for different photographic applications.

Autofocus Capabilities

Autofocus performance is another critical area where these lenses differ. The VILTROX 25mm lens employs a built-in STM stepping motor, delivering precise autofocus and tracking capabilities. It also supports eye and face AF for enhanced responsiveness. Conversely, the VILTROX AF 16mm lens is designed for fast and quiet autofocus, making it suitable for both stills and video. While both lenses offer reliable autofocus, the 25mm lens's additional features could be more beneficial for portrait photographers seeking to capture moving subjects quickly.

Lens Construction and Design

The physical design and build quality of a lens can significantly affect usability. The VILTROX 25mm weighs only 170 grams, making it lightweight and portable, ideal for on-the-go shooting. In contrast, the VILTROX AF 16mm lens, weighing 19.5 ounces, is more robust but still manageable for a full metal body lens. This heavier construction may provide better durability, but users who prioritize lightweight equipment may lean towards the 25mm lens. The 16mm also includes a built-in LCD display that provides real-time information, a feature that the 25mm lacks.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the two lenses is substantial, with the VILTROX 25mm priced at $176.00 and the VILTROX AF 16mm at $580.00. This means the 25mm lens is approximately 69% cheaper than its counterpart. For photographers on a budget, the 25mm lens offers excellent value without sacrificing essential features like autofocus and image quality. However, if your photography demands the specific capabilities of the 16mm lens, the higher price may be justified.

Intended Use

The intended use of each lens plays a significant role in determining which one will best suit your needs. The VILTROX 25mm lens is versatile, making it suitable for a range of photography styles, including portraits, street photography, and casual shooting. Its lightweight design allows for effortless handling, particularly during impromptu photo sessions. In contrast, the VILTROX AF 16mm lens is geared towards those who require an ultra-wide perspective, making it ideal for landscape and architectural photography. The choice ultimately depends on your specific photography style and the types of subjects you wish to capture.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the VILTROX 25mm f1.7 and the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 comes down to your camera system and photographic needs. If you own a Sony E-Mount camera and are looking for an affordable, lightweight lens that excels in portrait and general photography, the 25mm is an excellent choice at $176.00. However, if you have a Nikon Z-Mount camera and require an ultra-wide lens for landscape or architectural shots, the 16mm lens, while more expensive at $580.00, offers superior image quality and functionality. Ultimately, your specific requirements will dictate the best option for you.