vsversusfinder

VILTROX vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — VILTROX wins on elements and groups, VILTROX wins on weight and aperture.

Winner

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 offers excellent portability and versatility, while the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z excels in portrait photography. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why VILTROX is better

Price

The 35mm lens is $96 cheaper.

Weight

The 35mm lens is 190 grams lighter.

Versatility

The 35mm lens is suitable for various photography styles.

Why VILTROX is better

Aperture

The 85mm lens has a wider aperture for better bokeh.

Optical Quality

The 85mm lens has superior optical design for portraits.

Close-Up

The 85mm lens has a closer minimum focus distance.

Overall score

VILTROX
78
VILTROX
85

Specifications

SpecVILTROXVILTROX
AutofocusSTMSTM
BokehGoodExcellent
BuildLightweightErgonomic
Price$179$275
Use CaseVersatilePortraits

Dimension comparison

VILTROXVILTROX

Overview of the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens

In this comparison, we will examine the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 E-Mount Large Aperture Lens and the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens. The former is priced at $179.00, while the latter is available for $275.00, making the 35mm option about 35% cheaper. Both lenses cater to different photography needs and styles, appealing to distinct user preferences.

Design and Build Quality

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 boasts a lightweight design at just 170 grams, making it highly portable for spontaneous shooting situations. In contrast, the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z weighs 360 grams, which, while still manageable, is significantly heavier. The 35mm lens’s compact body allows for easy handling, suitable for both urban and natural landscapes. On the other hand, the 85mm lens is designed for more serious portrait work, which may require a more robust build to handle extended sessions.

Aperture and Bokeh

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 features a large aperture of F1.7, which creates beautiful natural bokeh, thanks to its 9 aperture blades. This lens excels in producing dreamy blur effects that highlight subjects effectively. In comparison, the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z has a slightly narrower aperture of F2.0 but still provides stunning background blur that is ideal for professional portrait photography. While both lenses excel in creating bokeh, the 35mm lens offers a marginally faster aperture for low-light shooting.

Autofocus Performance

For autofocus, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 utilizes a built-in STM stepping motor, ensuring precise autofocus and tracking, especially beneficial for eye and face AF. The 85mm F2.0 Z also features an STM, promoting smooth, quiet, and precise focusing, making it suitable for both photography and video. Both lenses are engineered for quick and efficient autofocus, but the 35mm may have the edge in responsiveness due to its lightweight design, which could enhance tracking performance in dynamic situations.

Optical Quality

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 incorporates an optical structure of 11 elements in 9 groups, including 1 ED lens and 1 aspherical lens, ensuring high-definition results. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z boasts 10 elements in 8 groups, equipped with Extra-low Dispersion (ED) elements to minimize chromatic aberration. Both lenses deliver impressive sharpness and color accuracy, but the 35mm's design may offer a slight advantage in versatility for various shooting scenarios.

Portability and Use Cases

Weighing in at 170 grams, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is exceptionally portable, making it perfect for travel and street photography, where quick adjustments and mobility are paramount. The 85mm F2.0 Z, while heavier, is still manageable and is ideally suited for portrait photography due to its focal length and background separation capabilities. Thus, the choice between these lenses may largely depend on the photographer's intended use; the 35mm is more versatile, while the 85mm is specialized for portraits.

Price Comparison

The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is priced at $179.00, making it an accessible option for photographers looking for quality without breaking the bank. The VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z, priced at $275.00, is a premium investment aimed at professionals seeking top-notch portrait capabilities. The substantial price difference of about $96 means that budget-conscious buyers may lean towards the 35mm lens unless they specifically require the features of the 85mm.

User Experience and Handling

The lightweight 35mm F1.7 is designed for convenience, allowing photographers to shoot for extended periods without discomfort. Its compact nature makes it less tiring to carry around. In contrast, the 85mm F2.0 Z, while more substantial, is ergonomically designed for comfort during longer shooting sessions, especially for portrait work. Both lenses provide a satisfactory user experience, but the choice may depend on whether portability or ergonomics is more important to the photographer.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 and the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you're looking for an affordable, lightweight lens for a variety of shooting scenarios, the 35mm F1.7 is an excellent choice at $179.00. However, if portrait photography is your primary interest and you require a lens that excels in that domain, the 85mm F2.0 Z, though more expensive at $275.00, offers features tailored to those particular requirements. Consider your priorities, budget, and intended use to make the best decision for your photography journey.