vsversusfinder

VILTROX AF vs YONGNUO

Updated July 2026 — VILTROX AF wins on filter size and weight, YONGNUO wins on length.

Winner

The VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 offers superior image quality and advanced features, making it ideal for serious photographers, while the YONGNUO 35MM F1.8 is a budget-friendly option for casual users.

Why VILTROX AF is better

Image Quality

VILTROX has superior optical performance.

Autofocus

Faster and quieter autofocus system.

Build Quality

Premium metal construction with LCD display.

Why YONGNUO is better

Price

YONGNUO is significantly cheaper.

Weight

Lighter and more portable.

Versatility

Compatible with a wider range of cameras.

Overall score

VILTROX AF
88
YONGNUO
70

Specifications

SpecVILTROX AFYONGNUO
Focal Length16mm35mm
Aperture Rangef/1.8 - f/22f/1.8 - f/22
Elements710
AutofocusYesYes
CompatibilityNikon ZSony E

Dimension comparison

VILTROX AFYONGNUO

Overview of the Lens Options

In this comparison, we look at the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 Z Full Frame Lens and the YONGNUO 35MM F1.8 Art Auto Focus Lens. Both lenses target different users and camera systems, offering unique features that cater to specific photography needs. The VILTROX lens, priced at $580.00, is designed for Nikon Z-mount cameras, while the YONGNUO lens is a more budget-friendly option at $128.00 for Sony E-mount cameras, making it about 78% cheaper than the VILTROX lens.

Build Quality and Design

Both lenses are well-constructed but cater to different aesthetics and functionalities. The VILTROX AF 16mm features a full metal body and is compact, weighing only 19.5 ounces, making it a sturdy companion for outdoor photography. It also includes an LCD display for easy access to lens information. In contrast, the YONGNUO 35MM F1.8, while also featuring a metal bayonet and outer shell, is designed with a focus on durability against various environmental conditions, thanks to its dustproof and waterproof rubber ring. The VILTROX lens offers a more premium feel, while the YONGNUO caters to practicality, making both appealing depending on user preference.

Autofocus Performance

When it comes to autofocus capabilities, the VILTROX AF 16mm excels with its fast, precise, and quiet autofocus system, supporting both stills and video. Its minimum focus distance of just 0.88 feet allows photographers to capture dynamic close-ups with beautiful bokeh. On the other hand, the YONGNUO 35MM F1.8 is also equipped with a quiet autofocus system and a minimum focusing distance of 0.35 meters, which is slightly less impressive than its competitor. While both lenses provide reliable autofocus, the VILTROX offers a more advanced experience suited for those focusing on high-quality video and still photography.

Image Quality

In terms of image quality, the VILTROX AF 16mm lens stands out with its three aspherical elements and four extra-low dispersion (ED) glass elements, which work together to suppress color bleeding and enhance corner-to-corner resolution. This lens is designed to deliver exquisite bokeh and clarity, even at its maximum aperture of f/1.8. The YONGNUO 35MM F1.8 also provides impressive image quality with its 10 elements in 9 groups and two aspherical lenses to combat aberration. However, it may not reach the same level of optical excellence as the VILTROX, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, making the VILTROX a better choice for those who prioritize pristine image quality.

Compatibility and Use Cases

The VILTROX AF 16mm is tailored specifically for Nikon Z-mount mirrorless cameras, which include models like the Z9, Z8, and Z7II. This specialization allows it to optimize features for these cameras. In contrast, the YONGNUO 35MM F1.8 is compatible with a wide range of Sony E-mount cameras, including the A7 series and the ZV-E1. This makes the YONGNUO lens a versatile option for Sony shooters, particularly those looking for a standard prime lens for both photography and video work. The choice between the two should consider the camera system in use as well as the types of photography being pursued.

Price Consideration

Price plays a significant role in the decision-making process between these two lenses. The VILTROX AF 16mm is priced at $580.00, while the YONGNUO 35MM F1.8 is significantly more economical at $128.00. This makes the YONGNUO lens about 78% cheaper than the VILTROX, which is a considerable factor for budget-conscious photographers. While the VILTROX may offer superior features and performance, the YONGNUO lens provides excellent value, especially for those who are just starting out or who need a reliable lens without breaking the bank.

Target Audience

The intended audience for these lenses varies significantly. The VILTROX AF 16mm caters to professional photographers and serious enthusiasts who seek high-quality optics and advanced features for their Nikon Z-mount cameras. It is ideal for landscape, architecture, and astrophotography, where wide-angle capabilities shine. On the other hand, the YONGNUO 35MM F1.8 is better suited for entry-level photographers or those who need a reliable, everyday lens for their Sony E-mount cameras. Its affordability and good performance make it a great option for casual shooting, event photography, and video recording.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 and the YONGNUO 35MM F1.8 largely depends on your camera system and photography needs. If you own a Nikon Z-mount camera and prioritize image quality and advanced features, the VILTROX is the clear choice despite its higher price. However, if you’re a Sony shooter looking for a budget-friendly and versatile lens for everyday use, the YONGNUO offers excellent performance at a fraction of the cost, making it a solid option for both novice and intermediate photographers.