BENOISON vs Canon EF 75-
Updated July 2026 — Canon EF 75- leads on focal length and weight.
The Nikon lens is a great budget option for portrait photography, while the Canon lens offers versatility for various shooting scenarios.
Why BENOISON is better
Price
Nikon lens is significantly cheaper at $96.22.
Portrait Quality
Excels in portrait photography with a large aperture.
Lightweight
Easier to handle for extended shooting sessions.
Why Canon EF 75- is better
Versatility
Canon lens offers a zoom range of 75-300mm.
Autofocus
Features a DC motor for faster focusing.
Compatibility
Works with a wide range of Canon SLR cameras.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | BENOISON | Canon EF 75- |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/1.8 | f/4-5.6 |
| Focusing | Manual | Autofocus |
| Zoom Type | Fixed | Zoom |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Camera Compatibility | Nikon | Canon |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The 85mm f1.8 Portrait Lens - F Lens for Nikon is priced at $96.22, while the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens costs $199.99. This makes the Nikon lens about 52% cheaper than its Canon counterpart. Both lenses target different photography styles, with one focusing on portrait photography and the other designed for versatile telephoto applications. Understanding their unique features will help potential buyers make an informed choice based on their specific needs.
Intended Use and Photography Style
The 85mm f1.8 Portrait Lens excels in portrait photography, offering a large aperture of f1.8 that allows for stunning background bokeh and shallow depth-of-field effects. This lens is particularly suitable for half-body and full-body portraits, making it an excellent choice for photographers who prioritize detail and aesthetics in their portraits. On the other hand, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens is a telephoto zoom lens, ideal for capturing distant subjects, such as wildlife or sports. Its versatile focal length range of 75-300mm allows photographers to zoom in on far-off action or isolate subjects in a scene, making it a great option for those who enjoy versatility in their shooting style.
Focusing Mechanism
The 85mm f1.8 Portrait Lens is a manual focus lens, requiring users to adjust the focus manually by turning the focus ring. This can be a limitation for some photographers who prefer the convenience of autofocus, especially in fast-paced shooting scenarios. The lens must be set to manual mode on compatible Nikon cameras to function correctly, which may present a learning curve for beginners. In contrast, the Canon EF 75-300mm features a DC motor for autofocus, providing a smoother and quicker focusing experience. This makes it more user-friendly, particularly for photographers who need to capture fast-moving subjects or prefer to focus quickly without manual adjustments.
Compatibility and Camera System
The 85mm f1.8 Portrait Lens is specifically designed for Nikon cameras, including popular models like the D3500, D850, and D7500, among others. However, it is important to note that it is not compatible with Nikon's Z-series mirrorless cameras. This limits its versatility for Nikon users who may also use updated camera systems. In contrast, the Canon EF 75-300mm lens is compatible with Canon SLR cameras, making it widely usable across various Canon models. This added compatibility might appeal to Canon users looking for a reliable telephoto option, especially those using different Canon bodies in their photography.
Build Quality and Design
The 85mm f1.8 Portrait Lens is designed to be lightweight and easy to handle, making it a practical choice for extended shooting sessions. However, as a manual focus lens, it may not have the same level of built-in stabilization or advanced features that more modern lenses possess. The Canon EF 75-300mm lens, while slightly heavier at 16.8 ounces, features an improved zoom mechanism that allows for smoother zooming. This feature can enhance the shooting experience, especially when quickly adjusting focal lengths during a shoot. Both lenses are built with their target audience in mind, but the Canon lens offers a more user-friendly design for those who appreciate zoom functionality.
Price Comparison
At $96.22, the 85mm f1.8 Portrait Lens is significantly more budget-friendly than the Canon EF 75-300mm lens, which retails for $199.99. This price difference of approximately $103.77 makes the Nikon lens about 52% less expensive. For photographers on a budget or those just starting, the lower price point of the Nikon lens could be a compelling reason to choose it. However, for those who require the versatility of a zoom lens, the Canon lens, despite its higher price, may justify the expense with its expanded focal range.
Image Quality and Performance
The 85mm f1.8 Portrait Lens is designed to deliver excellent image quality, particularly for portraits, thanks to its large aperture that enhances depth-of-field and background separation. While the product description does not provide detailed optical performance metrics, the emphasis on achieving sharp, detailed images suggests strong performance in its intended use case. The Canon EF 75-300mm lens also offers decent image quality, but it lacks image stabilization, which could be a concern for photographers shooting at longer focal lengths where camera shake is more pronounced. The absence of stabilization may require users to rely on faster shutter speeds or higher ISO settings, affecting overall image quality.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the 85mm f1.8 Portrait Lens and the Canon EF 75-300mm lens ultimately depends on your shooting needs and preferences. If you are focused on portrait photography and desire a lens that excels in creating beautiful bokeh, the Nikon lens is an excellent choice, especially given its lower price of $96.22. However, if you seek versatility and the ability to capture a range of subjects with a zoom lens, the Canon EF 75-300mm is worth the investment at $199.99, despite its lack of image stabilization. Each lens has its strengths, so consider how you plan to use them to make the best decision.

