vsversusfinder

adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash vs ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,

Updated August 2026 — adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash wins on price and comfort, ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, wins on durability and performance.

The adidas Women's Response Pace Running offers better value and comfort, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 excels in performance and durability.

Why adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash is better

Price

adidas is $19.25 cheaper

Comfort

Cloudfoam cushioning provides excellent support

Style

Bolder color options available

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better

Performance

Rearfoot GEL technology enhances shock absorption

Durability

Designed for long-term wear

Fit

Mesh upper allows for a snug fit

Overall score

adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash
85
ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
78

Specifications

Specadidas Women's Response Pace Running, DashASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
CushioningCloudfoamRearfoot GEL
Upper MaterialTextileMesh
SocklinerOrtholiteOrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite
Sales Rank939412467
ColorwayDash Grey/Silver Metallic/Beam OrangeGravel/Lilac HINT

Dimension comparison

adidas Women's Response Pace Running, DashASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,

Overview of adidas Women's Response Pace Running

The adidas Women's Response Pace Running is priced at $50.70, making it about 27% cheaper than its competitor. This shoe offers a regular fit and features Cloudfoam cushioning, which is designed for all-day comfort and support. With a sales rank of 9,394, it is moderately popular among consumers. The shoe's textile upper and Ortholite sockliner contribute to its comfort and breathability, ensuring that wearers experience a pleasant running experience. Its stylish Dash Grey/Silver Metallic/Beam Orange colorway also makes it visually appealing for fashion-conscious runners.

Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes

The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes are priced at $69.95, which is approximately 38% more expensive than the adidas option. This model boasts a sales rank of 12,467, indicating a slightly lower popularity compared to the adidas shoe. It features a mesh upper and incorporates Rearfoot GEL technology for cushioning and shock absorption, enhancing the overall comfort during runs. The AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning and OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite sockliner further improve moisture management and breathability, making these shoes suitable for long-term wear.

Comfort and Support

In terms of comfort, the adidas Women's Response Pace Running excels with its Cloudfoam cushioning, which offers substantial support for prolonged activities. The Ortholite sockliner adds an extra layer of comfort, making it a solid choice for daily runs. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 employs Rearfoot GEL technology that provides effective shock absorption and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning for a soft ride. Both models focus on comfort, but the adidas shoe might appeal more to those prioritizing a blend of comfort and affordability.

Design and Style

The design of the adidas Women's Response Pace Running is characterized by its modern color scheme of Dash Grey, Silver Metallic, and Beam Orange, providing a stylish flair for runners. The textile upper not only contributes to the shoe's aesthetic but also enhances breathability. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features a Gravel/Lilac hint colorway, which is equally attractive but leans more towards a classic athletic look. Both shoes have their unique appeal, but the adidas shoe offers a bolder option for those looking to make a statement.

Performance and Durability

When it comes to performance, both shoes are engineered for running, but they utilize different technologies. The adidas Women's Response Pace Running is built for comfort with its Cloudfoam cushioning, which makes it ideal for runners seeking a cushioned experience. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is designed with a focus on shock absorption and durability, thanks to its Rearfoot GEL and AMPLIFOAM PLUS features. This differentiation suggests that the ASICS shoe may be better suited for runners who prioritize performance over long durations.

Fit and Sizing

The adidas Women's Response Pace Running offers a regular fit, which should accommodate most foot shapes comfortably. However, its sizing may be limited to specific measurements, such as the size 8 available. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in size 9 and is designed to enhance fit through its mesh upper, allowing for a snug yet comfortable experience. Runners should consider their specific sizing needs when choosing between these two options, as the fit can significantly impact performance and overall satisfaction.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the adidas Women's Response Pace Running and ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is significant. At $50.70, the adidas shoe is about $19.25 cheaper than the ASICS model, which is priced at $69.95. This roughly 27% price disparity may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers. While the ASICS shoe offers advanced cushioning technologies, the adidas shoe provides excellent value for those seeking quality running shoes at a lower price point.

Which should you buy?

When deciding between the adidas Women's Response Pace Running and the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, your choice should depend on your priorities. If you value affordability and comfort, the adidas model, priced at $50.70, is an excellent option with its Cloudfoam cushioning and stylish design. However, if performance, durability, and advanced shock absorption are your main concerns, the ASICS model at $69.95 may better suit your needs. Ultimately, both shoes offer unique benefits, so it's essential to consider what aspects matter most to you in your running experience.