adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash vs Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide leads on fit and traction.
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running offers great affordability and comfort for casual runners, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 excels in advanced cushioning and performance for serious runners.
Why adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash is better
Price
adidas is significantly cheaper at $50.70
Comfort
Cloudfoam cushioning provides good comfort
Simplicity
Straightforward design appeals to casual users
Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better
Cushioning
Advanced DNA LOFT V3 cushioning enhances comfort
Fit
Wide size option accommodates broader feet
Durability
Constructed with rubber outsole for longevity
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash | Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Response Pace | Ghost Max 3 |
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | DNA LOFT V3 |
| Fit Type | Regular | Wide |
| Sales Rank | 9394 | 2293 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of adidas Women's Response Pace Running and Brooks Women Ghost Max 3
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running is priced at $50.70, making it about 68% cheaper than the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, which retails for $159.95. This significant price difference is a crucial factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for good running shoes. While both shoes are designed for running, they cater to different preferences and budgets, making it essential to consider their features and performance.
Comfort and Cushioning
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running features Cloudfoam cushioning, providing all-day comfort and support for runners. This design is particularly beneficial for those who prioritize long-lasting comfort during their runs. In contrast, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 incorporates a high stack of nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3, which enhances comfort and responsiveness. The unique construction of the Brooks shoe adds more volume, accommodating orthotics and ensuring a snug fit. While both shoes emphasize comfort, the Brooks model offers a more advanced cushioning technology, potentially making it preferable for serious runners.
Fit and Design
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running comes in a regular fit and features a textile upper with laces, ensuring a classic and secure fit. This simplicity can appeal to those who prefer a straightforward design. On the other hand, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is designed with a low-top profile and a wide size option, making it suitable for runners with broader feet. Its sleek sporty style combined with enhanced comfort makes it a stylish choice for various occasions. Thus, if fit and design are significant considerations, the wider fit of the Brooks may better serve those needing a more accommodating shoe.
Performance and Versatility
When it comes to performance, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, with its impressive bestseller rank of 2293, indicates a strong preference among consumers for its performance capabilities. The shoe’s construction and cushioning are tailored for serious runners, potentially providing a more responsive running experience. In comparison, while the adidas Women's Response Pace Running has a lower sales rank of 9394, it still offers reliable performance for casual runners or those engaging in light training. Therefore, serious runners might lean towards the Brooks for more intense use, while the adidas shoe suits more casual or recreational settings.
Durability and Material Quality
Both shoes are constructed from quality materials, but the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 likely excels in durability due to its advanced features like a rubber outsole and nylon lining. These materials contribute to its longevity, making it suitable for frequent use on various terrain types. The adidas Women's Response Pace Running, with its textile upper, also promises durability, but it may not match the ruggedness of the Brooks. For those seeking a shoe that can withstand heavy use, the Brooks may be the more reliable option.
Price Considerations
The price difference between the two models is substantial, with the adidas Women's Response Pace Running retailing for $50.70 and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 at $159.95. This means the Brooks shoe costs about 215% more than the adidas model. For budget-conscious buyers or those who are new to running, the lower price of the adidas shoe makes it an attractive option. However, those willing to invest in a higher-priced shoe may find the Brooks model justifies its cost through performance and comfort enhancements.
Brand Reputation and Consumer Feedback
Both adidas and Brooks are reputable brands in the running shoe market, but they cater to slightly different audiences. Brooks is often favored by serious runners and has a strong community following, reflected in its bestseller rank. The adidas brand appeals to a broader audience, including casual runners and those looking for stylish activewear. Consumer feedback often highlights the superior cushioning and fit of Brooks shoes, while adidas is recognized for its comfort and affordability. Choosing a brand may come down to personal preference and the type of running experience desired.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, your choice between the adidas Women's Response Pace Running and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 will depend on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for an affordable, comfortable shoe for casual running, the adidas model is a solid choice at $50.70. However, if you're a serious runner seeking advanced cushioning and a more inclusive fit, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, priced at $159.95, may be worth the investment. Consider how often you run and the type of performance you desire to make the best decision for your running journey.

