adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on cushioning and fit.
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running is a budget-friendly option for casual runners, while the Brooks Glycerin 21 offers superior cushioning and support for serious athletes.
Why adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash is better
Price
adidas is significantly cheaper at $50.70.
Comfort
adidas features Cloudfoam cushioning for all-day comfort.
Fit
adidas has a regular fit accommodating various foot shapes.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks uses nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 for superior softness.
Support
Brooks provides neutral support ideal for serious runners.
Breathability
Brooks features an engineered warp knit upper for enhanced airflow.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Response Pace | Glycerin 21 |
| Sales Rank | 9394 | 29881 |
| Upper Material | Textile | Warp Knit |
| Cushion Type | Cloudfoam | DNA Loft v3 |
Dimension comparison
Overview
When it comes to running shoes, the adidas Women's Response Pace Running and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe offer distinct features catering to different preferences. The adidas model is priced at $50.70, making it about 56% cheaper than the Brooks shoe, which retails for $114.95. This price difference sets the stage for a deeper exploration of what each shoe brings to the table.
Comfort and Cushioning
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running features Cloudfoam cushioning designed for all-day comfort, making it a suitable option for casual runners or those who prioritize comfort during their daily activities. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin 21 is engineered for runners seeking "super-soft cushioning," with nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning providing an upscale plush experience. While both shoes aim for comfort, the Brooks model emphasizes a high level of softness and support, which can be particularly beneficial for avid runners or those undergoing longer training sessions.
Fit and Support
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running has a regular fit with laces, accommodating a wide range of foot shapes. Its textile upper and Ortholite sockliner further enhance comfort and breathability. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin 21 offers a plush internal fit with a stretch bootie that surrounds the foot, designed for flexibility and stability during runs. This shoe is recognized for providing neutral support, which is ideal for road running and cross-training. If you value a snug, adaptive fit, the Brooks shoe may be the superior choice.
Style and Aesthetics
In terms of style, the adidas Women's Response Pace Running comes in a Dash Grey/Silver Metallic/Beam Orange color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a more understated yet vibrant look. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin 21 presents a timeless Black/Grey/White combination, making it versatile enough to match various athletic and casual outfits. While both shoes are aesthetically pleasing, the choice ultimately depends on personal style preference.
Performance and Use Case
The adidas model ranks at 9,394 in bestseller rank, indicating its popularity among casual runners who may not require advanced features. It's suitable for light jogging or everyday wear. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin 21, with a bestseller rank of 29,881, targets serious runners looking for performance and comfort in longer distances. This difference in target audience suggests that if you're a dedicated runner, the Brooks may offer the performance enhancements you seek.
Breathability and Temperature Control
Breathability is crucial for running shoes, especially during warmer months. The adidas Women's Response Pace Running features a textile upper that allows for decent airflow, keeping your feet cooler. The Brooks Glycerin 21 employs an engineered warp knit upper, enhancing breathability while ensuring a soft feel against the foot. This design may provide better temperature control during extensive workouts, making it a preferable option for those who run in warmer climates.
Weight and Ease of Use
While specific weight details are not provided for either shoe, the Brooks Glycerin 21 is known for its lightweight construction despite its plush cushioning, optimizing performance without sacrificing comfort. The adidas Women's Response Pace Running also aims for a lightweight feel, but its focus is more on general comfort rather than performance. Runners may find the Brooks model easier to maneuver through different terrains and distances, owing to its thoughtful design focused on stability and responsiveness.
Price and Value
The price difference between the two models is significant, with the adidas Women's Response Pace Running available for $50.70 compared to the Brooks Glycerin 21 at $114.95, making the Brooks shoe about 127% more expensive. This raises questions about value depending on your running needs. If you are a casual runner or someone who prioritizes budget, the adidas shoe offers excellent comfort for the price. Conversely, serious runners may find the Brooks' advanced cushioning and support worth the higher investment.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the adidas Women's Response Pace Running and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 boils down to your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a comfortable, affordable running shoe for casual wear, the adidas model is a great choice. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning, breathability, and are willing to invest more for better performance, the Brooks Glycerin 21 may be the better option. Consider your running habits and personal preferences to make the best decision for your footwear needs.

