Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes,
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 leads on fit and comfort.
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 offers a better blend of style and performance at a lower price, making it the preferred choice for budget-conscious shoppers.
Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better
Price
Run 70s 2.0 is $54.86, cheaper than Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 at $57.00.
Sales Rank
Run 70s 2.0 has a better sales rank of 2634 compared to 8845.
Design
Run 70s 2.0 features a classic leather and textile design.
Why adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, is better
Sustainability
Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is made with at least 50% recycled content.
Comfort
Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 has a memory sockliner for superior comfort.
Weight
Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is lighter due to its flexible upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 | adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | adidas |
| Upper Material | Leather/Textile | Textile |
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | Cloudfoam |
| Fit | Runs Big | Women's Fit |
| Colorway | White/Black/Grey | Black/Black/Core White |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is priced at $54.86, while the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes are available for $57.00. This means that the Run 70s 2.0 is about 2% cheaper than the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0. With a sales rank of 2634, the Run 70s 2.0 is also positioned better in terms of popularity compared to the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0, which has a sales rank of 8845. This price difference, albeit small, can be a deciding factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, both shoes maintain a classic adidas aesthetic but cater to different preferences. The Run 70s 2.0 features a combination of leather and textile in a striking White/Black/Grey colorway, embodying a blend of racing and training heritage. Conversely, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is offered in a sleek Black/Black/Core White color scheme with a soft textile upper, providing a more minimalist look. The choice between these designs will likely depend on personal style, with the Run 70s 2.0 appealing to those who prefer a retro vibe and the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 catering to fans of modern simplicity.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, both models excel with unique cushioning technologies. The Run 70s 2.0 incorporates Cloudfoam cushioning for lightweight step-in comfort and a synthetic outsole designed for durability. Additionally, it features a soft textile lining for enhanced comfort. In contrast, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 boasts a memory sockliner that molds to the foot for superior comfort, along with a cushioned midsole for added support. While both options prioritize comfort, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 may provide a more customized fit due to the memory foam feature.
Performance and Functionality
The performance of both shoes is tailored to meet the needs of runners, but they have slight differences. The Run 70s 2.0 is designed for a fast feel, making it suitable for both racing and training with its lightweight EVA midsole. On the other hand, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 focuses on providing a comfortable running experience with its stretchy upper and plush cushioning. If you're looking for versatility in performance, the Run 70s 2.0 may be the better option, whereas the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is ideal for casual runners seeking comfort over speed.
Material and Sustainability
Material choice plays a role in the appeal of each shoe. The Run 70s 2.0 is crafted from durable leather and breathable textile, emphasizing a classic aesthetic. In comparison, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 stands out for its commitment to sustainability, as it is made with at least 50% recycled content. This focus on eco-friendly materials may resonate with environmentally conscious consumers. If sustainability is a priority for you, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 offers a modern solution that aligns with a more responsible shopping choice.
Target Audience
Both shoes cater to women but with slightly different target audiences. The Run 70s 2.0 appeals to those who appreciate a blend of heritage style and functional design, making it suitable for both casual wear and running. Its classic design and comfortable fit make it a versatile choice for various activities. In contrast, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is tailored for those seeking a lightweight, running-specific fit with a more modern aesthetic. Its soft upper and cushioning make it particularly appealing to everyday runners or those seeking an all-day sneaker.
Durability and Maintenance
Durability is a crucial factor when investing in running shoes. The Run 70s 2.0 features a synthetic outsole designed for reliable grip, while its leather and textile upper offer a solid construction for longevity. The Cloudfoam Pure 2.0, while lightweight, also offers a durable design with its cushioned midsole for long-lasting comfort. Both options are designed to withstand regular use, but the leather component of the Run 70s 2.0 may require more maintenance to keep it looking its best compared to the simpler care of the textile upper on the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for a more affordable option that combines classic style with performance capabilities, the Run 70s 2.0 may be the ideal choice. However, if sustainability, a modern aesthetic, and comfort are your main priorities, then the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 could be the better fit. Both shoes offer quality and comfort, making either a solid addition to your running shoe collection.

