Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 wins on style, ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on comfort and cushioning.
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 offers great value and comfort for casual runners, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 excels in advanced cushioning and performance.
Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better
price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $54.86.
design
Classic design appeals to traditional sneaker lovers.
weight
Lightweight construction for casual runs.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
cushioning
Advanced cushioning technologies for better comfort.
breathability
Engineered mesh upper enhances breathability.
performance
Designed for smoother strides and longer runs.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | ASICS |
| Model | Run 70s 2.0 | Gel-Cumulus 27 |
| Upper Material | Leather/Textile | Engineered Mesh |
| Cushioning Tech | Cloudfoam | FF BLAST PLUS |
| Outsole | Synthetic | FLUIDRIDE |
| Fit Recommendation | Runs big | Standard |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is priced at $54.86, making it significantly more budget-friendly compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27, which retails for $109.95. The price difference of about 50% reflects a substantial gap that may influence buyers on a budget. Both shoes cater to runners but feature distinct designs and technologies that enhance their performance and comfort levels.
Design and Aesthetics
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a classic design with a blend of leather and textile upper, providing a timeless look that is both stylish and functional. The shoe showcases the signature three-stripe branding of Adidas, appealing to those who appreciate iconic athletic wear. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is designed with an engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability, making it ideal for longer runs. While both shoes are visually appealing, the Adidas offers a more traditional sneaker aesthetic, whereas the ASICS leans towards a modern, performance-focused look.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is pivotal when choosing running shoes, and both options deliver in their own ways. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 incorporates Cloudfoam technology, providing lightweight step-in comfort and superior cushioning, making it suitable for casual runs. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 employs FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technologies, which enhance impact absorption and offer a responsive rebound. This advanced cushioning system results in improved comfort during prolonged wear, especially for runners seeking extra support while logging miles.
Performance and Technology
Performance is where the differences in technology become apparent. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is designed with a lightweight EVA midsole that promotes a fast feel, appealing to those who enjoy a more agile running experience. However, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is tailored for those who prioritize cushioning and stability, featuring a FLUIDRIDE outsole that facilitates smoother strides. The ASICS model, with a sales rank of 8263, is ideal for runners looking for enhanced performance over longer distances, while the Adidas shoe, ranked at 2634, serves those who prefer a nimble running style.
Fit and Sizing
Fit can significantly affect the running experience, and the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 runs big, recommending that buyers consider purchasing half a size smaller. This sizing detail is essential for ensuring that the shoe fits comfortably. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 does not specify fit adjustments in the available data, suggesting it may offer a standard sizing experience. The difference in fit recommendations could be a deciding factor for buyers who prioritize a snug fit versus those who prefer a more spacious feel.
Durability and Material Quality
Durability is crucial for running shoes, and both brands employ quality materials. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a durable leather and textile upper, ensuring longevity while also being lightweight. The synthetic outsole is designed for reliable grip and durability, making it suitable for various terrains. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 focuses on a breathable engineered mesh upper, which may enhance comfort but could be less durable than leather in rugged conditions. Both shoes are crafted with durable materials, but the choice between leather and mesh could impact long-term wear.
Price Comparison
Price is a significant factor in any purchase decision, and the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is approximately $55, making it about 50% cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27, which is priced at $109.95. This substantial price difference may attract budget-conscious consumers or those new to running who are hesitant to invest heavily in footwear. While the ASICS shoe offers advanced technologies that justify its higher price, the Adidas model provides excellent value for those who prioritize affordability without sacrificing quality.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 boils down to your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for a budget-friendly option that offers a classic design and lightweight comfort, the Adidas model is a solid choice. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning and performance for longer runs, the ASICS shoe, albeit at a higher price, might be worth the investment. Each shoe has its strengths, catering to different types of runners and their unique requirements.

