Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide leads on fit and cushioning.
The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 offers superior cushioning and support, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is a budget-friendly option for casual wear.
Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $54.86.
Style
Adidas has a versatile design suitable for casual outings.
Weight
Adidas offers a lightweight feel for shorter runs.
Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better
Cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 for enhanced comfort.
Support
Brooks has a high stack height for better support on long runs.
Fit
Brooks accommodates orthotics and provides a more inclusive fit.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 | Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Run 70s 2.0 | Ghost Max 3 |
| Upper Material | Leather/Textile | Nylon |
| Outsole | Synthetic | Rubber |
| Fit | Runs big | Inclusive fit |
| Sales Rank | 2634 | 2293 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Product Features
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 are both stylish running shoes designed for comfort and performance. However, they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. The Adidas shoes are priced at $54.86, making them about 66% cheaper than the Brooks, which retails for $159.95. This significant price difference highlights the varying target markets and features of both products.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 excels with its nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 cushioning, providing a plush feel for runners. This shoe's unique construction allows for a more inclusive fit, accommodating orthotics and enhancing overall comfort during longer runs. In contrast, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features Cloudfoam technology for lightweight cushioning, but it is important to note that these shoes run big, suggesting that buyers should opt for half a size smaller for the best fit.
Style and Design
In terms of style, both sneakers have their distinct aesthetics. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 showcases a blend of classic racing and training heritage with a sleek white, black, and grey color scheme. This gives it a versatile look suitable for casual outings as well as workouts. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 boasts a sporty design with a striking black and rose gold color combination that appeals to those who prefer a modern, stylish touch in their athletic wear. The choice between these shoes may come down to personal style preferences.
Durability and Materials
The materials used in these shoes contribute to their durability and overall performance. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a combination of leather and textile in its upper, promoting a sturdy yet breathable construction. This helps ensure longevity while providing comfort. On the other hand, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 has a nylon lining and a rubber outsole designed for reliable traction. Both shoes are constructed to withstand regular use, but the choice of materials may impact how each shoe performs in different environments.
Performance and Support
Performance is a critical factor for runners, and both shoes offer unique advantages. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is designed with a high stack height to enhance support, making it ideal for long-distance runs or those requiring extra cushioning. This shoe has a best-seller rank of 2293, indicating its popularity among consumers seeking performance. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, while also capable, is more focused on offering a lightweight feel, making it suitable for shorter runs or casual wear. The performance aspect may influence buyers depending on their running goals.
Price Comparison
Price plays a significant role in the decision-making process for many consumers. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is priced at $54.86, whereas the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is sold for $159.95. This means the Adidas shoe is about 66% cheaper than the Brooks, which may appeal to budget-conscious shoppers or those new to running. However, the higher price of the Brooks may reflect its advanced cushioning technology and broader fit options, suggesting a trade-off between cost and enhanced performance.
Brand Reputation
Brand reputation can significantly influence purchasing decisions. Adidas is known for its innovative designs and commitment to quality, while Brooks has established itself as a leader in the running shoe market, particularly for those seeking high-performance footwear. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3's bestseller rank of 2293 indicates strong consumer trust in its capabilities. While both brands are reputable, loyal customers may prefer one over the other based on past experiences or brand loyalty.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 largely depends on individual needs and preferences. If you're looking for a budget-friendly option that still offers comfort and style for casual wear or shorter runs, the Adidas shoes might be the right choice for you. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning and support for longer distances, the Brooks is worth the investment despite its higher price. Ultimately, consider your running habits, budget, and personal style before making a decision.

