Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof leads on waterproof and support.
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is a budget-friendly option with a stylish design, while the Brooks Women's Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offers advanced support and waterproof features for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $54.86.
Design
Adidas has a classic and stylish design.
Weight
Adidas is lighter, making it suitable for casual wear.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Support
Brooks features a Guiderails Holistic Support System.
Waterproofing
Brooks has GORE-TEX for waterproof protection.
Performance
Brooks is designed for a smooth, reliable running experience.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Upper Material | Leather/Textile | Air Mesh |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
| Sales Rank | 2634 | 22780 |
| Fit | Runs Big | True to Size |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is significantly more budget-friendly than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, costing $54.86 compared to $165.00. This makes the Adidas option about 67% cheaper, which could be a crucial factor for budget-conscious shoppers. While both shoes cater to runners, the substantial price difference may influence your decision if you're looking for a more economical choice without compromising on quality.
Design and Aesthetics
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a classic design with a durable leather and breathable textile upper, available in a stylish White/Black/Grey colorway. The lace-up closure ensures a comfortable fit, complemented by the signature three-stripe branding that adds to its aesthetic appeal. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX showcases a modern look with an emphasis on functionality, featuring a striking Black/Knockout Pink/Aqua color scheme. While both shoes have their unique designs, the choice may ultimately depend on personal style preferences.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a significant highlight for both shoes, but they achieve it through different technologies. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 utilizes Cloudfoam cushioning, providing a lightweight feel and superior comfort for everyday wear. Alternatively, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX incorporates DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, designed to offer a smooth and soft ride. While both styles aim to enhance comfort, the specific cushioning technology may appeal differently to varying types of runners, particularly those with specific support needs.
Support Features
Support features vary greatly between these two models. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is designed with a Guiderails Holistic Support System that helps align the body during runs, providing stability and reducing excess movement. This makes it particularly suitable for runners needing additional support. In contrast, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 does not emphasize advanced support technologies, making it more streamlined for casual wear and training. Runners who prioritize support may find the Brooks offering more aligned with their needs.
Waterproofing
A key feature of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is its GORE-TEX Invisible Fit, which provides breathable waterproof protection. This is ideal for runners who often face wet conditions, as it keeps feet dry while maintaining comfort. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 lacks waterproofing features, making it less suitable for inclement weather. For those planning to run in various environments, the waterproof aspect of the Brooks shoe could be a decisive factor.
Performance and Versatility
In terms of performance, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is designed for a smooth, reliable running experience, making it versatile for road running, cross-training, and gym workouts. Its status as a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and its APMA Seal of Acceptance underline its performance credentials. Conversely, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is more focused on lightweight racing and casual training, lacking the extensive versatility of the Brooks model. Therefore, serious runners might gravitate towards the Brooks for its performance-oriented features.
Sales Rank and Popularity
Sales rank can provide insight into the popularity of each shoe. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 has a sales rank of 2634, indicating a solid market presence among consumers. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX has a higher sales rank of 22780, suggesting it may not be as popular among buyers. This discrepancy could reflect differences in consumer preferences, with the Adidas model appealing more broadly to casual users and the Brooks attracting a niche audience focused on supportive running footwear.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If budget is a primary concern, the Adidas model at $54.86 offers great value with its stylish design and lightweight comfort. However, if you're seeking advanced support, waterproof features, and enhanced performance, the Brooks shoe, albeit at a higher price of $165.00, may be the better investment for serious runners. Your choice should reflect your running habits and whether you prioritize price over performance or vice versa.

