Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running &
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running & leads on comfort and cushioning.
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 offers a stylish and budget-friendly option, while the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 provides advanced cushioning for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $54.86.
Style
Adidas has a retro aesthetic appealing for casual wear.
Weight
Adidas is lighter, making it suitable for casual use.
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running & is better
Cushioning
Brooks features advanced nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Stability
Brooks provides enhanced stability for serious runners.
Performance
Brooks is certified for diabetic use and promotes injury prevention.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running & |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Run 70s 2.0 | Ghost Max 2 |
| Sales Rank | 2634 | 16198 |
| Upper Material | Leather/Textile | Synthetic |
| Cushion Type | Cloudfoam | DNA Loft v3 |
| Fit | Runs big | True to size |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is priced at $54.86, making it about 46% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2, which retails for $101.45. This substantial price difference can be a deciding factor for many shoppers. If you're on a budget, the Adidas offering provides a stylish and functional option without breaking the bank. In contrast, while the Brooks shoe comes with a higher price tag, it promises advanced features targeted at serious runners and walkers who prioritize comfort and support.
Design and Aesthetics
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a blend of leather and breathable textile, providing a classic yet functional design. Its low-top silhouette and signature three-stripe branding make it visually appealing for casual wear. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 showcases a modern, sleek design in a Coconut Milk/Gray/Zephyr color palette. Both shoes have their unique appeal, but the Adidas model leans more towards a retro aesthetic, while the Brooks shoe offers a contemporary look suitable for both running and casual outings.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 integrates Cloudfoam technology, delivering lightweight step-in comfort and cushioning. However, it runs big, suggesting that buyers should consider purchasing a half size smaller. The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 is designed for maximized cushioning with nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 midsole foam, ensuring a soft and smooth ride. Additionally, it features GlideRoll Rocker transition technology that promotes effortless heel-toe transitions. For those prioritizing comfort on long runs or walks, the Brooks shoe may offer a superior experience.
Performance Features
The performance features of the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 stand out, especially for avid runners. It is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, which highlights its focus on health and safety. The shoe's high stack of cushioning and stability features ensure secure landings, making it suitable for various foot shapes and orthotics. In contrast, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is more of a lifestyle sneaker, designed for casual running and training, which might not provide the same level of performance for serious athletes.
Durability and Materials
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 uses a combination of durable leather and textile in its upper, promising longevity for everyday wear. The synthetic outsole contributes to its grip and durability. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 is built with a focus on protective cushioning and stability, making it sturdy enough for rigorous activities. Its structure aims to reduce energy absorption in foot soft tissues, which can prevent injuries. Both shoes offer durability, but the Brooks model may have an edge for those engaging in more intense workouts.
Target Audience
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is tailored for casual runners and those looking for versatile footwear that can transition from active use to everyday wear. Its stylish design and affordable price point make it appealing to a broader audience. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 targets serious runners and walkers who require advanced cushioning and support features for their activities. It’s ideal for individuals who prioritize performance and comfort during long distances.
Availability and Sales Rank
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 has a sales rank of 2634, indicating a steady demand in the competitive footwear market. Its blend of style, comfort, and affordability contributes to this popularity. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 has a sales rank of 16198, which suggests it may not be as widely sought after at the moment. This difference in sales rank could reflect various factors, including brand loyalty and specific market positioning.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you’re looking for a stylish, budget-friendly sneaker for casual activities, the Adidas model is a fantastic option at $54.86. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning and stability for serious running or walking, and are willing to invest more, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 may be worth its higher price of $101.45. Each shoe serves different purposes, catering to distinct preferences in the running and walking shoe market.

