vsversusfinder

Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 wins on price, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on fit and performance.

The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is a budget-friendly option, while the Brooks Women's Glycerin 21 offers superior comfort and cushioning. Choose based on your priorities.

Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better

Price

Adidas is significantly cheaper at $54.86.

Style

Adidas offers a classic design.

Weight

Adidas is lighter for casual wear.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Cushioning

Brooks features advanced nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.

Fit

Brooks provides a plush internal stretch bootie for better fit.

Support

Brooks has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance for support.

Overall score

Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5
65
Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -
85

Specifications

SpecAdidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -
CushioningCloudfoamDNA Loft v3
Upper MaterialLeather/TextileWarp Knit
WeightLightweightModerate
Support TypeNeutralNeutral
Bestseller Rank263429881

Dimension comparison

Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is priced at $54.86, making it about 52% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, which retails for $114.95. This significant price difference may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious shoppers. The Adidas model offers a more economical option while still delivering comfort and style. In contrast, the Brooks shoe is positioned as a premium product, justifying its higher price with advanced cushioning technology and support features.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 excels with its super-soft nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, designed for maximum plushness. This shoe is ideal for runners who prioritize a cushioned experience during their runs. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, while comfortable, utilizes Cloudfoam technology for step-in comfort and superior cushioning but may not match the level of softness offered by the Brooks. Thus, if supreme cushioning is your primary concern, the Brooks model may be the better choice.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a classic look with a blend of leather and breathable textile, available in a stylish White/Black/Grey color scheme. This timeless design appeals to those who appreciate a more traditional sneaker style. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, on the other hand, is presented in a sleek Black/Grey/White color combination. Its modern design includes a newly engineered warp knit upper for breathability and flexibility. The choice here largely comes down to personal style preference, but both models maintain a contemporary aesthetic.

Fit and Sizing

The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 runs large, with a recommendation to buy half a size smaller. This could be a consideration for those who prefer a snug fit. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 features an internal stretch bootie that adapts to the foot, promoting a customized fit that moves with each stride. This design enhances comfort and stability during runs. If a tailored fit is important to you, the Brooks model may provide a better experience, especially for those who value flexibility in their footwear.

Performance and Usage

For performance, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 is tailored for runners seeking neutral support and plush comfort during various activities, from road running to gym workouts. It has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating its suitability for extended wear. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is described as a blend of racing and training heritage, making it suitable for casual runs and daily wear. While both shoes perform well, the Brooks may be more appropriate for serious runners, while the Adidas could suffice for casual users.

Durability

Durability is a critical factor for running shoes, and both the Adidas Women’s Run 70s 2.0 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 are constructed with materials that enhance longevity. The Adidas shoe features a synthetic outsole designed for reliable grip and durability, while the Brooks model also incorporates durable materials optimized for a long lifespan. However, the Brooks's advanced cushioning and support systems may provide better long-term performance for regular runners, making it a potentially wiser investment despite the higher upfront cost.

Brand Reputation

Both Adidas and Brooks are respected brands in the running shoe market, but they cater to slightly different audiences. Adidas is known for its stylish designs and versatility, while Brooks is highly regarded for its focus on running performance and comfort. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 holds a bestseller rank of 29,881, indicating a solid market presence and consumer trust, whereas the Adidas Women’s Run 70s 2.0 has a bestseller rank of 2,634, suggesting it's a popular option among buyers. This difference in rankings may reflect the specific needs of consumers looking for either style or performance.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the choice between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 ultimately depends on your priorities. If budget is a primary concern, the Adidas option is significantly more affordable at $54.86 compared to the Brooks at $114.95. However, if you prioritize comfort, cushioning, and performance, the Brooks may justify its higher price with superior technology and support features. Assess your needs in terms of style, fit, and intended use to make the best decision for your running journey.