vsversusfinder

Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 wins on price and performance, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe wins on fit and comfort.

The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 offers a more economical choice with a classic design, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 excels in cushioning for serious runners.

Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better

Price

Adidas is $15.13 cheaper than New Balance.

Sales Rank

Adidas has a better bestseller rank (2634 vs 13745).

Design

Adidas offers a classic aesthetic.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better

Cushioning

New Balance features superior Fresh Foam cushioning.

Fit

New Balance has a more standard fit.

Versatility

New Balance is designed for everyday use.

Overall score

Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
78

Specifications

SpecAdidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
CushioningCloudfoamFresh Foam
Upper MaterialLeather/TextileKnit
OutsoleSyntheticRubber
WeightLightweightLightweight
DropNot specified8 mm

Dimension comparison

Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is priced at $54.86, making it approximately 21% cheaper than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8, which retails for $69.99. This price difference may be significant for budget-conscious shoppers looking for a quality running shoe. While the Adidas model offers a lightweight EVA midsole and Cloudfoam cushioning, the New Balance shoe features a Fresh Foam midsole, which is designed for an ultra-cushioned experience. If price is your primary concern, the Adidas option stands out as the more economical choice.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, both the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 are engineered to provide a pleasant wearing experience. The Adidas model incorporates Cloudfoam technology for lightweight step-in comfort and superior cushioning, which makes it ideal for casual wear and light running. In comparison, the New Balance shoe features a Fresh Foam midsole that is crafted to deliver an ultra-cushioned ride. This shoe is particularly suited for longer runs or workouts, as it aims to enhance comfort with its targeted ventilation. Therefore, serious runners may find the New Balance shoe to offer slightly better cushioning for extended use.

Design and Aesthetics

Both shoes boast appealing designs that cater to different tastes. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 showcases a blend of leather and textile in a classic white, black, and grey color scheme, appealing to those who appreciate a timeless look. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8, with its precision-engineered knit upper, offers a sleek and modern aesthetic. While both shoes are stylish, the Adidas model leans towards a more traditional vibe, while the New Balance shoe emphasizes contemporary design. Ultimately, the choice will depend on personal style preferences.

Fit and Sizing

Sizing can be a crucial factor when selecting running shoes. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 runs big, with a recommendation to buy half a size smaller. This could pose a challenge for some shoppers who may not be aware of this sizing nuance. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 does not mention any sizing issues, suggesting a more standard fit that may appeal to a wider audience. For those who are uncertain about sizing, the New Balance shoe may provide a more straightforward shopping experience.

Versatility

The versatility of a running shoe is essential for those who engage in various activities. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is crafted for racing and training, making it suitable for workouts and casual outings alike. Its durable leather and breathable textile construction provide a functional yet stylish option for different settings. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 is designed for everyday runs, workouts, and even casual wear. Its lightweight design and comfort features make it a well-rounded choice for a range of activities. Both shoes excel in versatility, but the Adidas model may appeal more to those who want a shoe that can transition seamlessly from training to casual wear.

Performance

In terms of performance, both shoes are built to meet the needs of runners. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a synthetic outsole designed for reliable grip and durability, which can enhance performance during runs. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8, however, takes a different approach with its integrated rubber outsole, aimed at providing enhanced underfoot comfort. This feature could be particularly beneficial for runners who prioritize a cushioned feel during their workouts. While both shoes offer solid performance, the New Balance model may cater better to those focused on comfort over longer distances.

Brand Reputation and Popularity

Brand reputation can play a significant role in purchasing decisions. Adidas holds a bestseller rank of 2634, indicating a solid presence in the market for running shoes. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 has a bestseller rank of 13745, suggesting it may not be as popular as the Adidas model. Brand loyalty and reputation often influence consumers, and the higher sales rank of the Adidas shoe could give it an edge in the minds of potential buyers.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 ultimately hinges on individual preferences. If you value price and a classic aesthetic, the Adidas model, priced at $54.86, is the more economical choice and offers solid comfort. However, if you prioritize superior cushioning and a modern design for longer runs, the New Balance shoe, at $69.99, may be worth the investment. Both shoes bring unique strengths to the table, so your final decision should align with your specific running needs and style preferences.