Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Updated August 2026 — Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 leads on breathability and comfort.
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 offers great value for casual use, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 excels in performance and comfort for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $54.86.
Style
Adidas has a classic design that suits casual wear.
Sales Rank
Adidas has a better sales rank at 2634.
Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better
Cushioning
Saucony features premium PWRRUN+ foam for superior comfort.
Breathability
Saucony has a breathable engineered mesh upper.
Performance
Saucony is designed for long-distance running with smooth transitions.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 | Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Upper Material | Leather/Textile | Engineered Mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic | High-abrasion Rubber |
| Cushioning Tech | Cloudfoam | PWRRUN+ |
| Weight | Light | Moderate |
| Ideal Use | Casual/Short Runs | Long Runs |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is significantly more affordable, retailing at $54.86. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker comes at a higher price of $119.95, making it about 118% more expensive than the Adidas model. This difference in price may influence your decision, particularly if you are budget-conscious or looking for a basic yet stylish running shoe. The Adidas model also has a sales rank of 2634, indicating a steady demand, while the Saucony model ranks at 34383, suggesting it may not be as popular among consumers.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker stands out with its premium PWRRUN+ foam, designed to provide maximum cushioning and excellent energy return. This feature is particularly beneficial for long runs and all-day wear. On the other hand, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 incorporates Cloudfoam technology for lightweight cushioning, making it comfortable for casual wear and short runs. While both models emphasize comfort, the Saucony's advanced cushioning technology might be more suited for serious runners or those who prioritize comfort over short distances.
Weight and Breathability
The Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker boasts a breathable engineered mesh upper that enhances airflow, providing a secure fit that minimizes irritation during extended wear. This design is ideal for warmer conditions or those who sweat more during workouts. In contrast, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a leather and textile upper, which, while durable, may not offer the same level of breathability as the mesh in the Saucony. If breathability and weight are key factors for you, the Saucony may be the better choice for performance-oriented activities.
Design and Aesthetics
Both running shoes bring distinct aesthetic qualities to the table. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a classic look with a blend of white, black, and grey, making it versatile for various casual outfits. The three-stripe branding also adds an authentic touch. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 comes in a stylish Vapor/Moon colorway, designed for those who prefer a modern appearance in their athletic footwear. The choice between the two may come down to personal style preferences, but both options offer appealing designs for daily wear.
Durability and Traction
Durability is another important aspect of running shoes, and both models have been constructed with materials that reflect their intended use. The Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is equipped with a high-abrasion rubber outsole for long-lasting durability and reliable traction on various surfaces. This feature is crucial for runners who tackle different terrains. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 also includes a synthetic outsole, designed to provide a reliable grip. However, it may not match the performance of the Saucony in terms of traction and durability, especially for serious runners.
Fit and Sizing
When considering fit, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 runs big, and it is advised to buy half a size smaller. This may impact your purchasing decision, especially if you are uncertain about your size. The Saucony Women's Triumph 22, with its engineered mesh upper, adapts to your foot for a secure fit, potentially eliminating sizing concerns. If you are looking for a straightforward fit, the Saucony may be more user-friendly, while the Adidas option requires more attention to sizing.
Performance for Running
For performance, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 is designed with updated midsole geometry that offers smooth transitions and is ideal for daily training and long distances. This makes it a robust choice for dedicated runners. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, while suitable for casual wear and short runs, does not provide the same level of performance enhancement. If you are serious about running and want a shoe that supports long-distance training, the Saucony is likely the better option.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 comes down to your specific needs and budget. The Adidas model is significantly more affordable at $54.86, making it an excellent choice for casual use or for those new to running. However, if you are a serious runner seeking advanced cushioning, breathability, and durability, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22, priced at $119.95, may justify the higher cost. Consider how you plan to use the shoes, your budget, and your personal preferences to make the best decision.

