Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 leads on cushioning and style.
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 offers a classic design and superior cushioning, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is more budget-friendly with excellent breathability. Ultimately, the choice depends on personal preference.
Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better
Cushioning
Cloudfoam technology provides superior comfort.
Design
Classic aesthetic with versatile color scheme.
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank indicates broader acceptance.
Why Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, is better
Price
5.5% cheaper than Adidas.
Breathability
Breathable mesh upper enhances airflow.
Weight
Lighter weight at 10.05 oz.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 | Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, |
|---|---|---|
| Upper Material | Leather/Textile | Mesh/Synthetic |
| Cushioning Type | Cloudfoam | Charged Cushioning |
| Outsole Type | Synthetic | Rubber |
| Fit Recommendation | Runs big | Standard fit |
| Color Options | Classic colors | Sleek design |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is priced at $54.86, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is slightly cheaper at $51.95, making it about 5.5% less expensive. If budget is a primary concern, the Under Armour option presents a more economical choice for consumers looking for quality running shoes. However, the price difference of $2.91 may not be significant enough for some buyers to sway their decision if they have a preference for one brand over the other.
Design and Aesthetics
Both the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 showcase appealing designs suitable for casual wear and running alike. The Run 70s 2.0 features a classic combination of white, black, and grey, allowing for easy pairing with various outfits. In contrast, the Charged Surge 4 offers a sleek white and distant gray look with metallic silver accents. While personal style will ultimately dictate preference, the unique color schemes and branding of both shoes cater to different tastes, ensuring that both options stand out in their own right.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is a key aspect of any running shoe, and both the Adidas and Under Armour offerings excel in this department. The Run 70s 2.0 utilizes Cloudfoam technology for lightweight step-in comfort and superior cushioning. It also features a soft textile lining, which enhances comfort further. Meanwhile, the Charged Surge 4 incorporates a Deluxe Comfort System sockliner that molds to the foot for ultimate step-in comfort, along with a Charged Cushioning midsole that provides excellent responsiveness. Both options prioritize comfort, but the specific technologies employed may appeal to different runners based on their individual preferences.
Upper Material and Breathability
The upper materials of both shoes differ, with the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 made from a durable leather and breathable textile combination. This design not only provides a classic aesthetic but also ensures adequate airflow during runs. On the other hand, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 boasts a breathable mesh upper with synthetic overlays, enhancing structure and support while maintaining airflow. While both shoes are designed to be breathable, the Under Armour's mesh construction may offer slightly better ventilation for warmer weather running.
Cushioning and Support
When it comes to cushioning, both shoes provide unique systems that cater to runner comfort. The Run 70s 2.0's Cloudfoam cushioning is specifically designed for lightweight comfort, making it an excellent option for those who prioritize a soft landing with each step. Conversely, the Charged Surge 4 utilizes Charged Cushioning, which not only offers comfort but also responsiveness and durability. This differentiation means that runners looking for a little more bounce in their stride may prefer the Under Armour option, while those seeking a plush experience might lean towards Adidas.
Outsole Durability
Both the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 feature durable outsoles designed for traction and longevity. The Run 70s 2.0 is equipped with a synthetic outsole, ensuring reliable grip and durability on various surfaces. Meanwhile, the Charged Surge 4 features a durable rubber outsole that provides traction and flexibility specifically where needed for toe-off. While both shoes are built to endure regular use, the choice of materials in the outsole may influence the overall performance based on a runner's specific needs, such as grip on different terrains.
Sales Rank and Popularity
In terms of popularity, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 has a sales rank of 2634, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 sits at a slightly lower rank of 2697. Although both products are relatively close in ranking, the slight edge that Adidas holds may indicate a broader acceptance or preference among consumers. However, it's important to note that sales rank can fluctuate, and personal preference for brand loyalty should also play a significant role in the decision-making process.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 ultimately hinges on individual preferences regarding comfort, style, and budget. The Under Armour option is about 5.5% cheaper, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious shoppers. However, the Adidas shoe may appeal more to those who appreciate its classic look and Cloudfoam cushioning. Both shoes excel in comfort, durability, and aesthetics, so the best choice will depend on what specific features resonate more with the individual buyer.

