vsversusfinder

Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 vs ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,

Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 leads on fit and cushioning.

The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is a more budget-friendly option with versatile features, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers advanced cushioning for serious runners.

Why Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 is better

Price

Adidas is $19.96 cheaper

Sales Rank

Adidas has a better sales rank of 6652

Weight

Adidas is lighter at 257g

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better

Cushioning

ASICS has advanced GEL technology

Moisture Control

ASICS features an OrthoLite sockliner

Durability

ASICS has a molded rubber outsole

Overall score

Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8
85
ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
78

Specifications

SpecAdidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
BrandadidasASICS
ModelRun Falcon 5Gel-Pulse 17
MidsoleCloudfoamAMPLIFOAM PLUS
OutsoleAdiwearMolded Rubber
UpperMeshMesh

Dimension comparison

Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,

Overview of the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 and ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17

The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is priced at $49.99, making it about 17% cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, which retails at $69.95. Both shoes cater to active women looking for stylish yet functional running shoes, but they each boast unique features that appeal to different preferences and needs.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the Run Falcon 5 features a sleek black and white color scheme, embodying a classic athletic look. Its airy mesh upper not only adds to its visual appeal but also enhances breathability for long wear. On the other hand, the Gel-Pulse 17 showcases a gravel and lilac combination, which may attract those who prefer a more colorful aesthetic. However, both models maintain a sporty vibe, ensuring that they can transition well from running to casual outings.

Comfort and Cushioning

Comfort is a crucial factor when choosing running shoes, and both models offer appealing cushioning technologies. The Run Falcon 5 utilizes a Cloudfoam midsole that promises cushioned comfort from the first wear, making it ideal for students or anyone on the go. In contrast, the Gel-Pulse 17 incorporates Rearfoot GEL technology, which absorbs shock and provides cushioning, along with AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning for a softer ride. While both shoes aim to enhance comfort, the Gel-Pulse 17 may offer an edge for those needing additional shock absorption.

Fit and Support

When it comes to fit, the Run Falcon 5 is designed with adjustable laces that allow for a snug fit, enhancing the overall support during activities. This feature is particularly beneficial for those who value a secure feel as they run or walk. Conversely, the Gel-Pulse 17 includes an OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite sockliner that enhances moisture management and breathability, contributing to a comfortable fit. While both shoes cater to fit and support, the choice ultimately hinges on whether one prefers adjustable lacing or enhanced moisture control.

Durability

Durability is essential for running shoes, and the Run Falcon 5 features a durable Adiwear outsole that ensures reliable wear for various activities. This is critical for individuals engaging in outdoor sports or casual wear. The Gel-Pulse 17 also boasts a molded rubber outsole that enhances its longevity. Both shoes seem well-equipped to handle regular use, but the specific needs of the user—such as terrain and frequency of wear—may influence the decision.

Performance and Versatility

In terms of performance, the Run Falcon 5 is described as lightweight and versatile, making it suitable for both running and everyday activities. Weighing in at 257 grams for a size US 5.5, it is designed to support busy lifestyles. The Gel-Pulse 17 is tailored for runners, with enhancements that focus on providing comfort during longer runs. This shoe is designed to support performance over extended periods, which may appeal more to serious runners compared to the more casual use of the Run Falcon 5.

Price Comparison

The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is priced at $49.99, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 comes in at $69.95, presenting a significant price difference of about $19.96. This makes the Run Falcon 5 a more budget-friendly option, appealing to those looking to save money without sacrificing quality. However, the price of the Gel-Pulse 17 may reflect its advanced cushioning technologies, which could justify the higher cost for dedicated runners.

Customer Reception

The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 holds a sales rank of 6,652, indicating a solid level of popularity among consumers. In comparison, the Gel-Pulse 17 has a sales rank of 12,467, suggesting it may not be as widely purchased. This difference in sales rank could suggest that the Run Falcon 5 resonates more with buyers looking for versatile, everyday footwear, while the Gel-Pulse 17 targets a more niche audience of serious runners.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you are looking for a versatile, budget-friendly shoe for daily wear and casual running, the Run Falcon 5 stands out as an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning and support for more serious running activities, the Gel-Pulse 17 may be worth the investment despite its higher price. Each shoe has its strengths, making the decision largely personal based on how you plan to use them.