Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 wins on weight and style, Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on waterproof and comfort.
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is a budget-friendly option for casual use, while the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offers advanced support for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 is better
Price
Adidas is $115.01 cheaper.
Weight
Adidas weighs 257 g, lighter than Brooks.
Versatility
Adidas is suitable for casual wear.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Support
Brooks has Guiderails for better support.
Waterproof
Brooks features GORE-TEX for waterproofing.
Cushioning
Brooks uses DNA LOFT v2 for superior cushioning.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Run Falcon 5 | Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX |
| Midsole | Cloudfoam | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Waterproof | No | Yes |
| Fit Technology | Adjustable laces | Guiderails |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, with a price difference of $115.01. The Run Falcon 5 is priced at $49.99, while the Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX costs $165.00. This makes the Adidas model about 30% cheaper than its Brooks counterpart. For budget-conscious consumers or casual runners, the lower price point of the Run Falcon 5 could be a compelling reason to choose it over the more expensive Brooks shoe.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 and Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offer distinct styles appealing to different tastes. The Run Falcon 5 features a sleek and lightweight design suitable for casual wear and everyday activities, highlighted by its airy mesh upper. In contrast, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX boasts a more technical appearance with its engineered Air Mesh and 3D Fit Print, designed for optimal performance and support. With a focus on both aesthetics and function, the Brooks model may attract those looking for a running shoe that performs as well as it looks.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 excels with its Cloudfoam midsole, providing cushioned comfort for long days. The shoe's lightweight nature (257 g for size 5.5) makes it an excellent option for those who prioritize comfort in their daily activities. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, known for its softness and lightweight feel. The combination of GORE-TEX waterproofing and dynamic cushioning provides a unique blend of comfort and protection for various outdoor conditions. Runners who prioritize an all-weather shoe might find the Brooks option more appealing.
Performance and Fit
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is designed for casual use, making it suitable for light running and everyday activities. Its adjustable laces ensure a snug fit, which is essential for maintaining comfort during wear. However, for serious runners, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offers a higher level of performance with its Guiderails Holistic Support System. This technology helps to align your body’s natural motion while preventing excessive movement, making it ideal for those who need more support during their runs. The Brooks shoe is tailored for runners who seek reliability and stability in their footwear.
Versatility
Versatility is a crucial factor for many consumers when choosing running shoes. The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is lightweight and versatile, making it suitable for various activities beyond running, such as casual outings and daily errands. Its durable Adiwear outsole also ensures it can withstand everyday wear. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is specifically designed for runners, offering features like waterproof protection and dynamic cushioning, which makes it ideal for road running, cross-training, and gym workouts. Depending on your lifestyle, one shoe may serve you better than the other.
Target Audience
The target audience for the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 appears to be casual runners and individuals seeking a comfortable shoe for everyday activities. Its lightweight design and affordability make it an attractive option for students and those with a busy lifestyle. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is aimed at serious runners who require additional support and performance features. This shoe is particularly suitable for those who need a waterproof option for varied weather conditions, including runners with specific needs like diabetic foot care due to its PDAC A5500 certification.
Sales Rank and Demand
In terms of market presence, the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 holds a sales rank of 6652, indicating a solid level of demand among consumers. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX ranks lower at 22780, suggesting that while it may be less popular in sales, it is still a reputable option for those seeking high-performance running shoes. The difference in sales rank may reflect the target audience's nature, with the Adidas model appealing to a broader range of casual users, while the Brooks shoe caters to a niche market of dedicated runners.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're seeking an affordable, lightweight shoe for casual use, the Run Falcon 5 is an excellent choice at $49.99. However, if you're a dedicated runner looking for advanced support and waterproof protection, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, despite its higher price of $165.00, may be worth the investment. Consider your lifestyle, running habits, and budget to make the best choice for your footwear needs.

