Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 vs Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 wins on style, Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral wins on weatherproof and comfort.
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is a budget-friendly, lightweight option for casual wear, while the Brooks Women's Ghost 16 Weatherized excels in performance and weather resistance. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $49.99.
Weight
Adidas is lighter at 257 grams.
Versatility
Adidas is suitable for casual wear and everyday activities.
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral is better
Traction
Brooks offers enhanced wet and dry traction.
Cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Weatherproofing
Brooks has a DWR mesh upper for weather protection.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 | Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Run Falcon 5 | Ghost 16 |
| Midsole | Cloudfoam | DNA Loft v3 |
| Upper | Mesh | DWR Mesh |
| Fit | Snug | Neutral |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is priced at $49.99, while the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized is considerably more expensive at $103.23. This makes the Adidas model about 51% cheaper than the Brooks shoe, which is a significant difference for budget-conscious shoppers. If you’re looking for a lightweight and versatile option that won’t break the bank, the Run Falcon 5 offers great value without compromising on essential features.
Design and Aesthetics
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 features a sleek black and white design that appeals to a broad audience and is versatile enough for various casual settings. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized stands out with its almond peach and coconut color scheme, making it visually striking. While both shoes have their unique aesthetics, the choice largely depends on personal preference: whether you prefer the understated elegance of the Run Falcon 5 or the vibrant look of the Ghost 16.
Comfort and Fit
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 boasts a Cloudfoam midsole designed to provide cushioned comfort. Weighing in at 257 grams for a size US 5.5, it offers a snug fit with adjustable laces, ensuring your foot feels secure. The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized, on the other hand, provides soft, nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning. This feature promotes lightweight comfort, making it ideal for long runs or outdoor activities. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the Brooks model offers a more specialized cushioning designed for various weather conditions.
Traction and Performance
When it comes to traction, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized excels with its enhanced wet and dry grip, ensuring stability on diverse surfaces. This shoe is designed for neutral support and offers exceptional traction, making it a reliable choice for outdoor runners. The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 features a durable Adiwear outsole, which also provides dependable wear for everyday activities but may not match the all-weather capabilities of the Brooks model. If traction in changing weather conditions is a priority for you, the Brooks shoe may be the better option.
Weight and Responsiveness
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is notably lighter at 257 grams, making it a responsive option for quick movements or casual wear. This lightweight design caters well to shoppers looking for a shoe that can transition easily between different activities. The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized, while not specified in weight, is designed with a soft midsole and segmented crash pad that promotes smooth transitions from landing to toe-off. If responsiveness and agility are essential for your activities, the lighter Adidas model may provide an edge.
Durability and Construction
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 features a durable Adiwear outsole, designed to handle everyday wear effectively. This robustness makes it a practical choice for students or those with an active lifestyle. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized includes a knit DWR mesh upper, which not only offers weather protection but also keeps feet dry and comfortable. The focus on weatherproofing in the Brooks shoe may appeal to runners who face various environmental conditions, while the Adidas model is more suited for general wear.
Target Audience
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is ideal for students or casual wearers seeking a lightweight, comfortable shoe for everyday activities. It is perfect for transitioning from campus to casual outings. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized is tailored for serious runners who prioritize performance, traction, and weather resistance. This shoe is engineered for those who run in varying conditions and require additional support and durability. Your choice will depend on whether you need a versatile everyday shoe or a high-performance running option.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 and the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly, lightweight option suitable for everyday use, the Adidas model—priced at $49.99 and ranked 6652 in sales—will serve you well. However, if you require specialized features like weatherproofing and enhanced traction for serious running, the Brooks option at $103.23, with a better sales rank of 5547, may justify the higher price. Each shoe has its strengths, so choose based on what aligns best with your lifestyle and needs.

