vsversusfinder

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide

Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 wins on breathability, Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide wins on comfort and cushioning.

The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path offers affordability and style, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 excels in comfort and performance.

Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better

Price

Adidas is $110.95 cheaper.

Weight

Adidas is lighter for casual wear.

Style

Adidas has a sleek design for everyday use.

Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better

Cushioning

Brooks features advanced DNA LOFT V3 cushioning.

Fit Options

Brooks offers a wide fit for comfort.

Performance

Brooks is better suited for serious running.

Overall score

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5
65
Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
85

Specifications

SpecAdidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
BrandadidasBrooks
ModelX_PLR PathGhost Max 3
CushioningCloudfoamDNA LOFT V3
UpperMeshNylon
OutsoleRubberRubber

Dimension comparison

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3. The Adidas model is priced at $49.00, which is about 69% cheaper than the Brooks at $159.95. This price difference is considerable, especially for those looking for budget-friendly running shoes. At a glance, the price tag of the Brooks model might suggest a premium product, but the Adidas option provides excellent value for everyday wear without breaking the bank.

Design and Aesthetics

The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path offers a sleek, lightweight design suited for casual wear and running inspiration. Its stylish black, white, and black colorway gives it a classic look, while the mesh upper enhances breathability. In contrast, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 presents a sporty aesthetic with a low-top design and a combination of black, black, and rose gold. This design not only appeals visually but also aims to provide enhanced comfort through its unique construction. While both models have appealing aesthetics, the choice largely depends on personal style preferences.

Comfort Features

In terms of comfort, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is designed with a high stack nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3, providing superior cushioning. This model also includes a lace-up design that offers a secure fit and accommodates orthotics, making it a good option for those needing additional support. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, on the other hand, features a Cloudfoam midsole for step-in comfort and cushioning. While both shoes are focused on comfort, the Brooks model appears to provide a more specialized cushioning system, ideal for long runs or extended wear.

Fit and Sizing Options

The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is available in standard sizing, specifically noted for its lightweight and breathable fit. However, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 takes it a step further by offering a wide fit option, which is particularly beneficial for those with broader feet. This inclusive sizing approach helps accommodate different foot shapes, making the Brooks model a potentially better choice for individuals needing extra room. The choice between these models may come down to personal fit preferences, especially for long-term comfort.

Performance on Different Terrains

Both the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 are designed to perform well, but their intended uses may differ. The Adidas model features a rubber outsole designed for outstanding grip, making it suitable for everyday wear and light running. In contrast, the Brooks model, with its specialized cushioning and high stack design, is built to handle a variety of terrains, offering better performance for serious runners. If you plan to take your shoes on more challenging terrains, the Brooks might be the better option.

Sales Rank and Popularity

In terms of popularity, both shoes hold respectable sales ranks, with the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path at 2,513 and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 slightly better at 2,293. This indicates that both models are well-received in the market, but the Brooks model is slightly more favored among consumers, perhaps due to its performance-focused design. This popularity can be a factor for buyers who tend to prefer products that are more commonly recommended and trusted by other users.

Brand Reputation

Adidas and Brooks are both reputable brands in the athletic footwear industry, known for their quality products. Adidas has carved a niche with its stylish, casual approach to running shoes, while Brooks specializes in performance footwear tailored for serious runners. Choosing between the two brands may depend on whether you prioritize aesthetics and everyday comfort or advanced performance features and technical design. Both brands have strong followings and customer loyalty, making either choice a solid investment.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 boils down to your specific needs and preferences. If you are looking for an affordable, stylish option for casual wear and light running, the Adidas model stands out with its price of $49.00 and lightweight design. However, if you are a serious runner seeking enhanced comfort and performance on various terrains, the Brooks model’s advanced cushioning and fit options might justify its higher price of $159.95. Consider your priorities—whether it’s budget, style, or performance—to make the best choice for your running and lifestyle needs.