Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running &
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running & leads on stability and comfort.
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a budget-friendly option for casual wear, while the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 offers superior performance for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $49.00.
Style
Adidas offers a sleek, minimalist design.
Lightweight
Adidas is designed for casual, everyday use.
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running & is better
Cushioning
Brooks features advanced nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Stability
Brooks provides a broad base for stability.
Performance
Brooks is designed for serious runners and walkers.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running & |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | X_PLR Path | Ghost Max 2 |
| Weight | Light | Moderate |
| Fit | Casual | Athletic |
| Use | Everyday | Running |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is priced at $49.00, making it about 52% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2, which retails for $101.45. This significant price difference makes the Adidas model an appealing option for budget-conscious shoppers. While the Brooks shoe offers advanced cushioning and features for serious runners and walkers, the Adidas sneaker provides a stylish and comfortable choice for everyday wear without breaking the bank.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a sleek black and white color scheme that appeals to those seeking a minimalist yet stylish look. Its lightweight and breathable mesh upper adds to its overall comfort and aesthetic appeal. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 showcases a unique color palette of Coconut Milk, Gray, and Zephyr that stands out for those who prefer a more vibrant shoe. Both shoes prioritize comfort and style, but the choice largely depends on personal taste and the intended use.
Comfort and Fit
The Adidas Women’s X_PLR Path is known for its Cloudfoam midsole, which provides excellent step-in comfort and cushioning. This feature is ideal for casual wear and light activities. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 offers a higher level of cushioning with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 midsole foam, designed for runners and walkers who require maximum comfort over longer distances. The Brooks shoe also boasts a broad base for stability and a fit that accommodates various foot shapes, making it suitable for those with specific orthotic needs.
Performance and Functionality
In terms of performance, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 excels with its GlideRoll Rocker transition technology, which aids in smooth heel-toe transitions, making it a great choice for serious athletes. Its design is certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic and comes with the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating a focus on health and injury prevention. The Adidas Women’s X_PLR Path, while not specifically designed for high-performance running, offers good grip and support for casual wear and light activities, making it a versatile everyday sneaker.
Target Audience
The Adidas Women’s X_PLR Path is targeted towards individuals seeking a stylish, lightweight sneaker for everyday use and casual outings. Its design and comfort features make it suitable for those who may not be serious runners but still desire a reliable shoe for daily wear. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 is specifically designed for serious runners and walkers who prioritize cushioning and stability in their footwear. Its certifications and advanced features cater to a more athletic audience, making it ideal for those who need a shoe that can handle rigorous activity.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The Adidas Women’s X_PLR Path has a bestseller rank of 2513, indicating a solid level of popularity among consumers. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 has a higher sales rank of 16198, suggesting that while it is a reputable choice, it may not be as widely purchased as the Adidas model. This could be attributed to the higher price point of the Brooks shoe, which may deter some potential buyers. For those looking for a popular and budget-friendly option, the Adidas shoe is clearly a favorable choice.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is an essential factor when considering running shoes. The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 is built with a high stack of cushioning that not only provides comfort but is also designed to withstand the wear and tear associated with regular running and walking. Its robust construction suggests a longer lifespan for serious athletes. The Adidas Women’s X_PLR Path, while durable enough for casual use, may not hold up as well under the demands of frequent, intense workouts. Therefore, for those looking for longevity in their footwear, the Brooks model may offer better value in the long run.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 comes down to your individual needs and budget. If you are looking for a stylish, budget-friendly sneaker for everyday wear, the Adidas model at $49.00 is an excellent choice. However, if you are a serious runner or walker in need of advanced cushioning and stability, the Brooks shoe, priced at $101.45, may be worth the investment for its superior performance features. Consider your intended use and budget to make the best choice for your footwear needs.

