Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on support and comfort.
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a budget-friendly option for casual wear, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 excels in performance and comfort for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $49.00.
Style
Adidas offers a stylish design for casual wear.
Weight
Adidas is lighter and more suitable for everyday use.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks features advanced nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Support
Brooks provides superior neutral support for runners.
Durability
Brooks uses engineered warp knit upper for better durability.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | X_PLR Path | Glycerin 21 |
| Sales Rank | 2513 | 29881 |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Warp Knit |
| Midsole | Cloudfoam | DNA Loft v3 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is priced at $49.00, making it significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, which retails at $114.95. With a price difference of about 57%, the Adidas sneaker is aimed at casual wearers seeking comfort and style, while the Brooks shoe is designed for serious runners looking for high-performance features and superior cushioning.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a sleek mesh upper in a striking black, white, and black colour scheme. This design not only looks stylish but also ensures breathability, making it suitable for everyday wear. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 sports a more traditional running shoe appearance with its black, grey, and white colour combination. The Glycerin 21’s design focuses on functionality, featuring an internal stretch bootie for a snug fit, which is particularly appealing for those who prioritize performance over style.
Comfort and Fit
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path offers a comfortable fit with its textile lining and Cloudfoam midsole, providing cushioned comfort for all-day wear. However, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 excels in this category with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning and plush internal fit. Brooks specifically markets the Glycerin 21 as providing "super-softness," which is ideal for serious runners. The brand even boasts that the shoe has been granted the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating its suitability for those requiring neutral support during their runs.
Performance Features
In terms of performance, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 is clearly the superior choice, emphasizing maximum cushioning and stability. It is designed for neutral support, making it apt for road running and cross-training. In contrast, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is categorized as a lightweight, running-inspired sneaker, focusing more on casual wear than on high-performance running characteristics. The Glycerin 21’s broad platform and smooth transitions enhance its running capabilities, while the X_PLR Path is less specialized.
Durability and Materials
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is made with a textile and synthetic mesh upper that promotes breathability and lightweight comfort. However, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 takes durability to the next level with its engineered warp knit upper, which is designed to be flexible and accommodating while maintaining a soft feel against the foot. This difference in materials suggests that the Brooks shoe may be better suited for rigorous training, while the Adidas option is more focused on casual wear.
Price and Value
At $49.00, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a budget-friendly option for those not looking to spend extensively on running shoes. This price is about 57% lower than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, which retails for $114.95. While the Adidas shoe provides excellent value for casual users seeking comfort and style, the Brooks shoe justifies its higher price tag with advanced technology and features tailored for serious runners. The question of value ultimately depends on how the buyer intends to use the shoes.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path holds a bestseller rank of 2,513, indicating a solid level of popularity among consumers. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 is ranked at 29,881, suggesting it may not be as widely purchased. This difference could reflect a preference among buyers for the affordability and casual style of the Adidas sneaker over the premium features of the Brooks option.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 largely depends on your specific needs. If you are looking for an affordable, stylish sneaker for casual wear, the Adidas option at $49.00 is hard to beat. On the other hand, if you are a dedicated runner seeking superior cushioning and support, the Brooks Glycerin 21, despite its higher price of $114.95, offers advanced features that justify the investment. Ultimately, your choice should align with your intended use and budget.

