Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral leads on comfort and fit.
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a budget-friendly option for casual wear, while the Brooks Women's Glycerin Stealthfit 22 offers advanced performance for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $49.00.
Weight
Adidas is lighter and more suitable for casual use.
Style
Adidas has a modern design appealing to everyday consumers.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral is better
Cushioning
Brooks features advanced DNA Tuned cushioning.
Support
Brooks provides better support for serious runners.
Performance
Brooks is designed for road running and cross-training.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | X_PLR Path | Glycerin Stealthfit 22 |
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | DNA Tuned |
| Upper | Mesh | Flat Knit |
| Sales Rank | 2513 | 14424 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is priced at $49.00, making it about 57% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22, which retails for $114.95. This significant price difference may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for a reliable pair of running shoes. The Adidas model offers good value for everyday wear without breaking the bank, while the Brooks, with its advanced cushioning technology, targets those willing to invest more for enhanced performance.
Design and Aesthetics
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a sleek and modern design with a black, white, and black color scheme that is both versatile and stylish. This shoe is designed for lightweight running and everyday activities, with a mesh upper for breathability. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 showcases a more sophisticated look with its white, grey, and black colorway. The updated flat knit upper not only enhances its aesthetic appeal but also offers a blend of stretch and compression for a snug fit. Both designs cater to fashion-conscious consumers, yet the choice ultimately depends on personal style preferences.
Comfort and Fit
In terms of comfort, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path boasts a Cloudfoam midsole that provides step-in comfort and cushioning, making it suitable for all-day wear. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 features DNA Tuned technology, which combines plush landings with energetic toe-offs. This shoe also offers neutral support, making it ideal for various activities, including road running and cross-training. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model may be better suited for serious runners seeking enhanced cushioning and support.
Performance Features
When it comes to performance, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 is designed with advanced DNA Tuned cushioning that adapts to the foot's movements, providing a smooth and stable running experience. It includes larger cells in the heel for soft landings and smaller cells in the forefoot for responsive toe-offs. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, while not as specialized, still offers a cushioned midsole and a rubber outsole for decent grip. Those who prioritize performance might find the Brooks shoe more appealing due to its advanced technology, reflected in its higher price point.
Versatility
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is marketed as a lightweight running-inspired sneaker suitable for everyday wear. This versatility makes it a great option for casual outings or light exercise. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 emphasizes its capability in road running and cross-training, making it more suitable for serious athletes. While both shoes can be worn in various settings, the Adidas model leans more towards casual use, whereas the Brooks shoe is tailored for athletic performance.
Brand Reputation
Both Adidas and Brooks are reputable brands in the footwear industry, each with its unique strengths. Adidas is well-known for its stylish designs and affordable options, making it a popular choice among everyday consumers. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path holds a sales rank of 2513, showing it has a solid presence in the market. Brooks, on the other hand, specializes in running shoes and has garnered a loyal following among serious runners. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 has a sales rank of 14424, indicating it may not be a bestseller but still offers a high-quality running experience.
User Experience and Feedback
User feedback on the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path often highlights its comfort and lightweight feel, making it a great choice for casual wear. Many appreciate the aesthetic and affordability of the shoe, which aligns well with everyday activities. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 receives praise for its exceptional cushioning and support, particularly for long-distance running. Users often mention the shoe's adaptability and the comfort it provides during various physical activities. While both shoes have their loyal fans, the Brooks model tends to attract those who prioritize performance and specialized features.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 boils down to your specific needs. If you are looking for an affordable, stylish shoe for everyday wear, the Adidas model is an excellent choice at $49.00. However, if you are a serious runner seeking advanced cushioning and support, the Brooks shoe, priced at $114.95, may justify the investment with its superior technology and performance features. Consider your lifestyle and how you plan to use the shoes to make the best choice for your needs.

