Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 wins on weight and style, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe wins on price and cushioning.
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a more affordable and stylish option for everyday wear, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 offers superior cushioning for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is $20 cheaper
Weight
Adidas is lighter for casual use
Style
Adidas has a minimalist design
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better
Cushioning
New Balance has advanced Fresh Foam cushioning
Durability
New Balance is designed for serious runners
Breathability
New Balance features a no-sew knit upper
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | New Balance |
| Model | X_PLR Path | Fresh Foam 680 V8 |
| Upper | Mesh | Knit |
| Midsole | Cloudfoam | Fresh Foam |
| Outsole | Rubber | Integrated Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is priced at $49.00, making it about 30% cheaper than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe, which costs $69.99. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running-inspired sneakers. The Adidas option offers a more economical choice while still providing essential features for everyday wear. On the other hand, the New Balance shoe's higher price could reflect its advanced cushioning technology and build quality, making it a viable option for those who prioritize performance and comfort in their running shoes.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path boasts a sleek and lightweight aesthetic, ideal for casual wear and running alike. Its mesh upper and rubber outsole contribute to a modern look that pairs well with various outfits. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 features a precision-engineered knit upper, designed not only for style but also for maximum comfort and targeted ventilation. Both shoes have unique visual appeal, but the Adidas option leans more towards a minimalist, sporty vibe, while the New Balance shoe offers a more structured, performance-driven appearance.
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is a standout feature in both models, but they cater to different needs. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path includes a Cloudfoam midsole, providing excellent cushioning for casual wearers. This makes it suitable for those who want a comfortable shoe for everyday use without focusing solely on running. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 is engineered with a Fresh Foam midsole that offers an ultra-cushioned, lightweight ride, making it a better choice for serious runners or those who need extra support during extended wear. The 8 mm drop is an additional feature that allows for a more natural running experience.
Performance and Functionality
In terms of performance, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 excels with its bio-based Fresh Foam cushioning, designed for durability and comfort during runs. The integrated rubber outsole enhances underfoot comfort, making it suitable for various activities, from running long distances to casual errands. On the other hand, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, while comfortable, is primarily a lifestyle sneaker rather than a performance running shoe. Its focus is on breathability and style, which is great for everyday use but may not meet the demands of serious runners.
Breathability and Materials
Both shoes feature breathable materials, but they achieve this in different ways. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path utilizes a textile and synthetic mesh upper, allowing for ample airflow to keep your feet cool and comfortable during wear. This is particularly beneficial for casual users who might wear the shoes for extended periods. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8's knit upper is designed for maximum comfort and ventilation. This no-sew construction not only provides a sleek fit but also promotes breathability, making it advantageous for those engaging in more intense activities.
Weight and Portability
Weight can significantly influence your choice of running shoes. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is lightweight, making it easy to wear throughout the day without feeling weighed down. This is important for casual users who want versatility in their footwear. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8, while also designed to be lightweight, incorporates more cushioning materials, which might add a bit of heft but enhances comfort during runs. If you prioritize lightweight construction for everyday use, the Adidas shoe may be the better option; however, if you seek a balance of cushioning and support, the New Balance shoe is commendable.
Brand Reputation and Popularity
Adidas and New Balance are both reputable brands in the footwear industry, each with its unique strengths. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path has a bestseller rank of 2,513, indicating a solid level of popularity among consumers looking for stylish and comfortable sneakers. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8, with a sales rank of 13,745, may not be as top-selling, but it appeals to serious runners seeking specialized features. Brand loyalty can play a significant role in buyer decisions, and both brands have established themselves as leaders in their respective niches.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, your choice between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 will largely depend on your needs and budget. If you are looking for an affordable, stylish, and lightweight sneaker for everyday wear, the Adidas option at $49.00 is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning and performance for running and are willing to invest more at $69.99, the New Balance shoe may be worth the extra cost. Both shoes have their unique advantages, making them suitable for different types of wearers.

