adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, vs ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on breathability and cushioning.
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes offer great value for casual use, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 excels in performance and support for serious runners.
Why adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, is better
price
adidas is significantly cheaper at $57.00
comfort
adidas offers a soft textile upper for casual wear
style
adidas has a sleek, minimalist design
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
performance
ASICS provides advanced cushioning for serious runners
technology
ASICS features FF BLAST PLUS for impact absorption
durability
ASICS is built for longevity under intense running conditions
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | ASICS |
| Model | Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 | Gel-Cumulus 27 |
| Upper Material | Textile | Mesh |
| Midsole | Cloudfoam | FF BLAST PLUS |
| Sales Rank | 8845 | 8263 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes are designed with a lightweight and comfortable fit, making them a solid option for casual runners and everyday wear. Priced at $57.00, they are about 48% cheaper than their competitor, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27, which retails for $109.95. The Cloudfoam's standout features include a soft textile upper and a memory sockliner that molds to the foot, providing superior step-in comfort. With a sales rank of 8845, they are popular among users looking for a blend of style and performance.
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes
In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes are positioned as a higher-end option, focusing on enhanced cushioning and support. At $109.95, they are designed for serious runners seeking comfort over longer distances. The Gel-Cumulus 27 features advanced technologies, such as FF BLAST PLUS for lightweight impact absorption and PureGEL for softer landings. With a sales rank of 8263, these shoes are well-regarded for their performance-oriented design and are a great choice for those prioritizing running efficiency.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 excels with its Cloudfoam midsole, which is specifically designed for step-in comfort and cushioning. The soft textile upper is stretchy and comfortable, providing a women's-specific fit that enhances overall wearability. In comparison, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers a different kind of comfort, featuring an engineered mesh upper to improve breathability and PureGEL technology for enhanced cushioning. While both shoes offer comfort, the adidas model is better suited for casual use, while the ASICS shoe targets serious runners needing additional support.
Design and Aesthetics
The design of the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes is sleek and modern, emphasizing a minimalist aesthetic with a black/black/core white color scheme. This look makes them versatile for both workouts and casual outings. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27, on the other hand, features a black/concrete colorway that offers a more dynamic and sporty appearance. While both shoes are visually appealing, the choice comes down to personal style preference and intended use, with the adidas option leaning more towards lifestyle and the ASICS focused on performance.
Technology and Features
In terms of technology, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 emphasizes comfort with its memory sockliner and cushioned midsole, making it ideal for everyday activities rather than intense running. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 brings advanced running technology to the forefront, boasting FF BLAST PLUS for lightweight impact absorption and a FLUIDRIDE outsole for smoother strides. These technologies are tailored to enhance running performance, suggesting that the ASICS may be the better choice for dedicated runners looking for high-performance footwear.
Price and Value
The price difference between these two models is significant, with the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 priced at $57.00 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 at $109.95. This makes the adidas option about 48% less expensive, providing excellent value for those not focused on high-intensity running. However, for serious runners who prioritize performance and cushioning, the higher price of the ASICS model could justify the investment, given its advanced features and technology aimed at enhancing the running experience.
Performance and Durability
In terms of performance, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is more suited for light running and casual wear, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is designed for durability and performance under pressure. The PureGEL technology in the ASICS shoe provides a significant advantage for runners, ensuring better shock absorption and joint protection. The adidas shoe, while comfortable, may not hold up as well under intense running conditions, indicating that the ASICS is built for longevity and better performance over time.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes and the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 largely depends on your specific needs. If you're looking for an affordable, lightweight shoe for casual use, the adidas model at $57.00 offers great value. However, if you are a serious runner seeking advanced cushioning and support, the ASICS at $109.95 is likely the better investment, delivering superior performance and durability. Ultimately, your decision should align with your running habits and budget.

