adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, vs Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide leads on fit and comfort.
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 offers a budget-friendly option with good comfort, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 excels in performance and cushioning.
Why adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, is better
Price
adidas is significantly cheaper at $57.00
Eco-friendly
adidas uses at least 50% recycled materials
Lightweight
adidas is designed for casual wear and comfort
Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better
Cushioning
Brooks features advanced nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 cushioning
Sales Rank
Brooks has a better sales rank at 2,293
Fit
Brooks accommodates orthotics and provides a more inclusive fit
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, | Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 | Ghost Max 3 |
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | DNA LOFT V3 |
| Fit | Women's-specific | Inclusive fit |
| Material | Recycled content | Nylon lining |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 and Brooks Women Ghost Max 3
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes are priced at $57.00, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 comes at a significantly higher price of $159.95. This stark difference of $102.95, or about 180%, positions the adidas model as a budget-friendly option for runners or casual wearers. Both shoes cater to women, but they offer different features and benefits that may appeal to distinct user needs.
Comfort and Fit
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is designed with a women's-specific fit, ensuring comfort during wear. Its soft textile upper is stretchy and comfortable, paired with a Cloudfoam memory sockliner that molds to the foot for superior step-in comfort. In contrast, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 emphasizes enhanced comfort through its high stack nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 cushioning and a lace-up design. This construction allows for more volume in the shoe, accommodating orthotics and providing a more inclusive fit. While both shoes focus on comfort, the Cloudfoam’s lightweight design may appeal more to those looking for a casual, easy-to-wear sneaker.
Style and Aesthetics
When it comes to style, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 showcases a sleek design in a black, black, and core white color scheme. This versatile look easily complements various outfits, making it suitable for both running and casual outings. On the other hand, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 features a sporty aesthetic with a black, black, and rose gold color palette. This adds a touch of elegance to the sporty design, appealing to those who appreciate a stylish running shoe. In terms of aesthetics, both options are visually appealing, but the choice comes down to personal preference in color and overall design.
Performance and Durability
Performance-wise, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 excels with its Cloudfoam midsole, which provides superior cushioning. This feature is particularly beneficial for those who prioritize comfort during their runs or walks. The Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, with its nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3, offers exceptional cushioning and responsiveness, delivering a more dynamic running experience. Although the adidas model is lightweight and comfortable, the Brooks may provide better performance for serious runners due to its advanced cushioning technology.
Material and Construction
The construction of the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 incorporates at least 50% recycled content, reflecting a commitment to sustainability. This choice of materials may resonate with eco-conscious consumers. In contrast, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 includes a nylon lining and an ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) insole, ensuring durability and comfort. While both shoes are designed for performance, the adidas model stands out for its environmentally friendly approach, which may be a deciding factor for some buyers.
Price Comparison
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is significantly more affordable at $57.00 compared to the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, which retails for $159.95. This price difference of about 180% makes the adidas model an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers or those who may not need the advanced features of the Brooks shoe. However, the higher price of the Brooks may be justified by its performance enhancements, making it a worthwhile investment for dedicated runners.
Popularity and Sales Rank
In terms of sales rank, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is ranked 2,293, indicating its popularity among consumers, particularly those seeking high-performance running shoes. The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 has a sales rank of 8,845, suggesting it is also well-received, particularly in the budget-friendly category. The higher sales rank of the Brooks shoe may suggest a greater level of trust and satisfaction among users, especially those who prioritize performance over price.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 comes down to individual needs and budget. If you are looking for a comfortable, stylish, and eco-friendly option at a significantly lower price, the adidas may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prioritize performance, enhanced cushioning, and are willing to invest more for those benefits, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is a strong contender. Each shoe offers unique advantages, ensuring that there is a suitable option for different types of runners and casual wearers alike.

