vsversusfinder

Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, vs Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide

Updated August 2026 — Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, wins on weight, Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide wins on price and popularity.

The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is a budget-friendly option for beginners, while the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 offers advanced features for serious runners.

Why Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, is better

Price

Adidas is significantly cheaper at $42.00.

Weight

Adidas weighs only 8.7 ounces.

Durability

Adidas features an Adiwear outsole for high-wear durability.

Why Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide is better

Comfort

Brooks has nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 for enhanced comfort.

Popularity

Brooks has a better sales rank at 2,293.

Fit

Brooks offers a more inclusive fit for orthotics.

Overall score

Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running,
65
Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
85

Specifications

SpecAdidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running,Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide
BrandadidasBrooks
ModelDuramo SL 2.0Ghost Max 3
Price$42.00$159.95
Weight8.7 ozunknown
CushioningLIGHTMOTIONDNA LOFT V3
OutsoleAdiwearRubber

Dimension comparison

Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running,Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 Black/Black/Rose Gold 8.5 Wide

Overview of the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and Brooks Women Ghost Max 3

When comparing the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, significant differences in pricing and features emerge. The Adidas model is priced at $42.00, making it about 73% cheaper than the Brooks model, which retails for $159.95. Despite this stark contrast in price, both shoes cater to specific needs within the running community.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running features a sleek and breathable mesh upper, which is crucial for runners looking for lightweight comfort. The shoe's color scheme of White/Black/Dash Grey presents a versatile style suitable for various running outfits. Conversely, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 offers a sporty look in Black/Black/Rose Gold, appealing to a more modern aesthetic. The high stack nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 in the Brooks adds a unique visual element while also enhancing comfort. Both designs are low-top, but the more inclusive fit of the Brooks model makes it a standout for those needing additional room.

Comfort and Fit

Comfort is a key factor in running shoes, and both models excel in different ways. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running provides lightweight cushioning with its LIGHTMOTION midsole, weighing in at just 8.7 ounces for size 7. This lightweight construction is perfect for short-to-mid distance training. On the other hand, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 features a nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT V3 that promises enhanced comfort and responsiveness. The Brooks model is designed to accommodate orthotics, making it an excellent choice for runners who need additional support.

Performance and Usability

When it comes to performance, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is built for short-to-mid distance running, making it ideal for beginners entering races. Its Adiwear outsole provides high-wear durability, ensuring the shoe can withstand regular use. In contrast, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3, with its advanced cushioning technology, is suited for longer runs, offering a plush feel that absorbs impact effectively. The Brooks model's sales rank at 2,293 indicates its popularity among serious runners, suggesting that it is well-regarded for performance.

Durability and Construction

Durability plays a pivotal role in the longevity of running shoes, and both models have features that enhance their lifespan. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running boasts an Adiwear outsole, renowned for its high-wear durability, which is essential for runners who frequently hit the pavement. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is constructed with a rubber outsole that contributes to its durability while offering a comfortable fit. The unique construction of the Brooks also adds volume to the shoe, catering to a wider audience, including those who wear orthotics.

Pricing and Value for Money

Price is a significant consideration, especially for those new to running. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is priced at $42.00, which is a compelling option for budget-conscious consumers. In contrast, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is priced at $159.95, reflecting its advanced technology and features. While the Adidas shoe offers a solid value for casual runners, the Brooks model may justify its higher price for those seeking enhanced performance and comfort over long distances.

Target Audience

The target audience for each shoe varies considerably. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is aimed at beginner to intermediate runners who prioritize affordability and lightweight options for training. It is perfect for individuals just starting their running journey. Conversely, the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 is designed for more serious runners who value comfort and are willing to invest in a higher-priced shoe for longer distances. The Brooks model’s popularity, as indicated by its bestseller rank, suggests it has a loyal following among experienced runners.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and the Brooks Women Ghost Max 3 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are a beginner looking for an affordable, lightweight shoe for short runs, the Adidas option at $42.00 presents an excellent choice. However, if you are an experienced runner seeking advanced cushioning and a more inclusive fit for longer distances, investing in the Brooks model at $159.95 could be worth it. Each shoe has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of runners.