Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, vs Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running &
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, wins on weight and breathability, Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running & wins on cushioning and stability.
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is a lightweight and affordable option, while the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 offers superior cushioning and stability for longer runs.
Why Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, is better
price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $42.00
weight
Adidas weighs only 8.7 ounces
design
Adidas has a classic minimalist look
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running & is better
cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning
stability
Brooks provides a broad base for stability
target audience
Brooks is suitable for longer distances and daily wear
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, | Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 Neutral Running & |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Duramo SL 2.0 | Ghost Max 2 |
| Midsole | LIGHTMOTION | DNA Loft v3 |
| Outsole | Adiwear | Certified Diabetic |
| Target Use | Short-to-mid distance | Long distance |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is priced at $42.00, making it significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2, which retails for $101.45, about 142% more expensive. While both shoes are designed for running, their features and target audiences differ substantially, making a direct comparison essential for potential buyers.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running features a sleek white, black, and dash grey color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a minimalist look. The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2, on the other hand, comes in a more unique coconut milk and gray colorway, providing a fresh and trendy appearance. Both shoes cater to women, but the aesthetic choices may attract different preferences; the Duramo SL is more classic, while the Ghost Max 2 leans towards modernity.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 excels with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 midsole foam, offering a high stack of cushioning for a soft and smooth ride. This shoe is designed for runners and walkers alike, ensuring a protective feel during impacts. In contrast, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running features adidas LIGHTMOTION cushioning, which provides a super-light step-in feel. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model offers maximized cushioning, making it a better choice for those seeking a plush experience.
Weight and Performance
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running weighs in at 8.7 ounces (for size 7), which is relatively light, enhancing performance during runs. This shoe is tailored for short-to-mid distance training, making it suitable for those who want agility in their stride. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 does not specify its weight, but it is designed to provide a stable ride with broad base support, focusing more on a secure fit than on lightweight performance. Therefore, for those prioritizing speed and lightness, the Duramo SL might be the preferred option.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is an essential factor for running shoes, and both models promise longevity through quality construction. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running boasts an Adiwear outsole, known for its high-wear durability, ensuring that it can withstand the rigors of regular training sessions. The Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 also emphasizes durability, being a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, which indicates it meets specific durability standards. While both shoes are built to last, the Adiwear outsole of the Duramo SL might give it an edge for those who run frequently.
Fit and Sizing
Fit is crucial in determining the overall experience of a running shoe. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is available in size 7.5, while the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 is offered in size 10.5 medium. The Brooks model is designed with a broad base and raised sidewalls for inherent stability and can accommodate various foot shapes, including orthotics. The Adidas shoe focuses on a lighter fit, which may appeal to runners looking for speed. Therefore, the choice between these two will depend on individual foot shape and the desired fit.
Target Audience
The target audience for these two shoes differs. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is aimed at women who need lightweight shoes for short-to-mid distance training, making them ideal for newcomers to running or those focusing on speed. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 is designed for runners and walkers looking for maximum cushioning and stability, making it suitable for longer distances and daily wear. Thus, prospective buyers should consider their running habits when choosing between these two options.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, choosing between the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and the Brooks Women’s Ghost Max 2 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner or walker. If you're looking for an affordable option that offers lightweight comfort for shorter runs, the Adidas model at $42.00 is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize cushioning and stability for longer distances and are willing to invest more, the Brooks model priced at $101.45 could be worth the splurge. Each shoe has its strengths, catering to different types of runners, so consider your running style and preferences carefully before making a decision.

