vsversusfinder

ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running &

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & leads on support and cushioning.

The Brooks Ariel GTS 24 offers superior support and cushioning, making it the better choice for serious runners and walkers. However, the ALTRA FWD VIA is a more budget-friendly option.

Why ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 is better

Price

ALTRA is $20 cheaper than Brooks

Foot Health

ALTRA promotes good foot health with APMA Seal

Lightweight

ALTRA features a lightweight design

Why Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & is better

Support

Brooks offers maximum support with GuideRails technology

Cushioning

Brooks has nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning

Sales Rank

Brooks has a significantly higher sales rank

Overall score

ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5
75
Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running &
88

Specifications

SpecALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running &
BrandALTRABrooks
ModelFWD VIAAriel GTS 24
CushioningAltra EGO FLODNA Loft v3
APMA SealYesYes
WeightLightModerate

Dimension comparison

ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running &

Price Comparison

The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe is priced at $99.97, while the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & Walking Shoe costs $119.95. This makes the ALTRA shoe about 17% cheaper than the Brooks model. If budget is a primary concern for you, the ALTRA option offers significant savings without compromising on quality. However, the higher price of the Brooks shoe may reflect its advanced features and technology designed for runners and walkers seeking maximum support.

Brand Reputation

Both ALTRA and Brooks are reputable brands in the running community. ALTRA is known for its focus on foot health and natural running mechanics, as evidenced by the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) Seal of Acceptance for the FWD VIA model. Brooks, on the other hand, has established itself as a go-to brand for serious runners, particularly with the Ariel GTS 24, which is also certified by the APMA. This recognition indicates that both brands prioritize comfort and health, but Brooks has a slightly more extensive history in the running industry.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Ariel GTS 24 offers nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which adapts to your unique stride, promising a soft and durable experience. In contrast, the ALTRA FWD VIA features Altra EGO FLO supercritical midsole foam for a lightweight and cushioned feel. While both shoes emphasize comfort, the Brooks model might edge out in terms of plushness and adaptability due to its advanced cushioning technology, making it particularly suited for longer runs or walks.

Support and Stability

The Brooks Ariel GTS 24 is designed with maximum support in mind, featuring GuideRails technology that helps maintain your natural motion path, limiting excess joint movement. This makes it an excellent choice for those who may require additional stability during their runs. The ALTRA FWD VIA also offers a rocker shape to promote an efficient toe-off, but it may not provide the same level of support as the Brooks model. If you prioritize stability and support, especially on longer distances, the Brooks is likely the better option.

Fit and Design

Fit is crucial for performance and comfort in running shoes. The Brooks Ariel GTS 24 is engineered to provide a generous, roomy fit, which can enhance comfort during long wear. The ALTRA FWD VIA, while also designed for comfort, may offer a slightly different feel due to its unique rocker shape. With both shoes designed to promote good foot health, the choice between them may come down to personal preference regarding fit. The Brooks model, however, tends to cater to a wider range of foot shapes with its roomier design.

Performance for Running and Walking

Both shoes are versatile enough for running and walking, but they cater to slightly different preferences. The Brooks Ariel GTS 24 is touted as a favorite among both runners and walkers for its combination of maximum support and comfort. In contrast, the ALTRA FWD VIA is designed to propel you forward with each step, making it a great choice for those who prefer a more natural running experience. If you are primarily a runner looking for that extra push, the FWD VIA could be appealing, while the Ariel GTS 24 may be better for those who value all-around stability.

Customer Satisfaction and Sales Rank

In terms of sales rank, the Brooks Ariel GTS 24 is significantly higher at 3,616 compared to the ALTRA FWD VIA, which stands at 23,294. This suggests that the Brooks model is more popular among consumers, likely due to its features tailored for support and comfort. While sales rank does not directly reflect quality, it can indicate a higher level of customer satisfaction and trust in the product. If you prefer a shoe that is already a favorite among many users, the Brooks may be the safer bet.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ALTRA Women’s FWD VIA Road Running Shoe and the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 ultimately depends on your priorities. If you are looking for a budget-friendly option that promotes foot health and offers a unique natural running experience, the ALTRA shoe is a solid choice at $99.97. However, if you require maximum support, stability, and a proven track record among runners and walkers, the Brooks model, despite its higher price of $119.95, may be worth the investment. Consider how you plan to use these shoes—whether for casual walks or serious running—to make the best decision for your needs.