ALTRA Women's Torin 8 Road Running Shoe, Black, 8.5 vs ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
Updated August 2026 — ALTRA Women's Torin 8 Road Running Shoe, Black, 8.5 wins on fit and comfort, ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, wins on price.
The ALTRA Women's Torin 8 excels in comfort and foot health, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 offers great value and versatility. Choose based on your running needs.
Why ALTRA Women's Torin 8 Road Running Shoe, Black, 8.5 is better
Comfort
Torin 8 promotes natural foot movement and has APMA approval.
Foot Health
Torin 8 emphasizes proper running form for better foot health.
Design
Torin 8 has a minimalist and athletic aesthetic.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
Gel-Pulse 17 is about 40% cheaper.
Versatility
Gel-Pulse 17 is suitable for both running and casual wear.
Cushioning
Gel-Pulse 17 features advanced shock absorption technology.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ALTRA Women's Torin 8 Road Running Shoe, Black, 8.5 | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ALTRA | ASICS |
| Current Price | $115.99 | $69.95 |
| Sales Rank | 11893 | 12467 |
| Cushioning | Balanced | GEL/AMPLIFOAM |
| Toe Box | FootShape | Standard |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Both Shoes
The ALTRA Women's Torin 8 Road Running Shoe and ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes offer distinctive features catering to different types of runners. The Torin 8 is designed for those who prioritize comfort and foot health, while the Gel-Pulse 17 focuses on cushioning and support. With the Torin 8 priced at $115.99 and the Gel-Pulse 17 at $69.95, there's a significant price difference of about 40%. This comparison will delve into their features, comfort, design, and overall performance to help determine which shoe is the better choice for your running needs.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ALTRA Women’s Torin 8 offers Signature Altra Balanced Cushioning and FootShape toe boxes, allowing the toes to spread naturally. This design encourages a low-impact running form, promoting overall foot health, as endorsed by the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA). On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 features Rearfoot GEL technology that provides cushioning and shock absorption, along with AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning for a soft ride. The Torin 8 emphasizes a more natural foot movement, while the Gel-Pulse 17 focuses on shock attenuation. Both shoes excel in comfort, but the Torin 8 may be better suited for long-distance runners looking for a more natural running experience.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the ALTRA Women’s Torin 8 is available in a classic black color, which gives it a versatile and sleek look suitable for various running conditions. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, with its gravel and lilac hint color scheme, offers a more colorful and vibrant appearance. The Torin 8 has a more athletic and minimalist aesthetic, while the Gel-Pulse 17 might appeal to those who prefer a bit of flair in their running gear. Ultimately, the choice between these designs may come down to personal preference, but both shoes maintain a stylish appearance fit for any runner.
Durability and Build Quality
The ALTRA Women’s Torin 8 is built to promote proper running form, which may contribute to its overall durability over time. Its design encourages low-impact running, potentially reducing wear on the shoe itself. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 utilizes a molded rubber outsole, which is known for its durability and traction on various surfaces. While both shoes are built with quality in mind, the Gel-Pulse 17's focus on shock absorption may lead to a slightly quicker breakdown under intense use, especially for heavier runners. Thus, if durability is a primary concern, the Torin 8 might have the edge.
Fit and Sizing
Fit is crucial when selecting running shoes, and the ALTRA Women’s Torin 8 prides itself on its FootShape toe box, which allows for natural toe splay. This feature can be particularly beneficial for runners with wider feet or those who prefer a roomier fit. The ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17, while also offering a comfortable fit, employs standard sizing that may not accommodate everyone’s foot shape as well as the Torin 8. Runners with specific foot shape concerns may prefer the Altra’s design, which emphasizes a more anatomical fit.
Performance and Versatility
In performance, the ALTRA Women’s Torin 8 is ideal for road running, with its balanced cushioning promoting an efficient stride. The shoe’s design allows for a natural foot movement, which can enhance performance over long distances. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 is versatile enough for both running and casual wear, making it suitable for everyday use. While the Torin 8 may excel in long-distance runs, the Gel-Pulse 17 offers adaptability for various activities, appealing to runners who also value versatility in their footwear.
Price and Value
Price is a significant factor in this comparison, with the ALTRA Women’s Torin 8 priced at $115.99 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 at $69.95. This makes the Gel-Pulse 17 about 40% cheaper than the Torin 8. For budget-conscious consumers, the Gel-Pulse 17 provides substantial value without compromising on essential features like cushioning and support. However, the Torin 8 justifies its higher price with its advanced foot health benefits and comfort features, which may be worth the investment for dedicated runners.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ALTRA Women’s Torin 8 and ASICS Women’s Gel-Pulse 17 depends on your specific running needs and budget. If you prioritize foot health, natural movement, and are willing to invest more for those features, the Torin 8 may be the better option. However, if you're looking for a solid, versatile running shoe at a more affordable price, the Gel-Pulse 17 is an excellent choice. Each shoe has its strengths, so consider your running style and preferences to make the best decision for your footwear needs.

