ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on price and cushioning, Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof wins on support and durability.
The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 offers superior cushioning and a lower price, while the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX excels in support and waterproof features.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $55 cheaper
Cushioning
Gel-Cumulus focuses on plush cushioning
Weight
Gel-Cumulus is lighter
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof is better
Support
Adrenaline GTS has Guiderails support
Waterproof
Adrenaline GTS features GORE-TEX
Durability
Adrenaline GTS built for sturdiness
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Cumulus 27 | Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX |
| Price | $109.95 | $165.00 |
| Waterproof | No | Yes |
| Cushioning Tech | FF BLAST PLUS | DNA LOFT v2 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes and Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX
When it comes to running shoes, comfort, support, and technology are key factors to consider. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $109.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, which costs $165.00. Both shoes cater to different runner needs, with the Gel-Cumulus focusing on cushioning and the Adrenaline GTS emphasizing support and waterproof features.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 stands out for its exceptional comfort, boasting FF BLAST PLUS technology that provides lightweight impact absorption and a responsive rebound. This model is designed for those who appreciate a cushioned feel during their runs. In contrast, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX features DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, which is also designed for a smooth ride but with an emphasis on support. While both models prioritize comfort, the Gel-Cumulus leans towards plush cushioning, making it ideal for long runs, whereas the Adrenaline GTS offers a blend of cushioning and support for a more stable experience.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is crucial for runners, and both shoes address this in their designs. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 features an engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability and comfort. This design helps keep feet cool during runs. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, on the other hand, incorporates Engineered Air Mesh with a 3D Fit Print for structure and fit, but it also includes a waterproof GORE-TEX layer, which may slightly compromise breathability in favor of weather protection. Thus, if your priority is maximum breathability, the Gel-Cumulus may be the better choice.
Support and Stability
Support is a defining feature of the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, which utilizes the Guiderails Holistic Support System. This technology helps align the body’s natural motion path while minimizing excess movement, making it ideal for runners who require additional stability. In contrast, while the ASICS Gel-Cumulus does provide cushioning, it does not focus specifically on support features like the Adrenaline GTS. Therefore, for runners needing extra support, especially those prone to injuries, the Brooks model is likely the superior option.
Weight and Performance
Weighing in on performance, the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 is marketed as the lightest and most padded model in its series. This lightweight design combined with its cushioning technology can enhance running efficiency. Conversely, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is built more for durability and support, which could contribute to a heavier feel. As a result, if speed and lightweight feel are your primary concerns, you might lean towards the Gel-Cumulus, while the Adrenaline GTS might suit those looking for a reliable and sturdy running experience.
Weather Resistance
One of the standout features of the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX is its waterproof GORE-TEX construction, which provides reliable protection from the elements. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who frequently face rainy conditions or wet terrains. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 does not offer waterproof capabilities, making it less suitable for adverse weather conditions. If you often run in unpredictable weather, the Brooks model is the clear winner in this category.
Aesthetics and Design
In terms of aesthetics, both the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX offer appealing designs. The Gel-Cumulus comes in a sleek black/concrete colorway, while the Adrenaline GTS features a bolder look with knockout pink and aqua accents. Choosing between them may come down to personal style preferences, but both brands maintain high standards in footwear design and functionality.
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is listed at $109.95, making it a more budget-friendly option compared to the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX, which retails at $165.00. This price difference of $55 highlights the Gel-Cumulus as a more accessible choice for runners looking for comfort without breaking the bank. However, the Adrenaline GTS offers advanced features, particularly in support and weather resistance, which may justify the higher price for serious runners.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, your choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 23 GTX should depend on your specific running needs. If you prioritize cushioning, breathability, and a lighter shoe for road running, the Gel-Cumulus is an excellent choice at a lower price point. However, if you require enhanced support, stability, and waterproof capabilities, the Adrenaline GTS may be worth the investment. Both shoes have their merits, but understanding your running style and preferences will guide you to the right decision.

