ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on fit and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers a better price and solid performance, while the Brooks Women's Glycerin 21 excels in cushioning and comfort.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $5 cheaper than Brooks.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank at 8,263.
Durability
FLUIDRIDE outsole enhances durability.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Fit
Brooks has a plush internal fit for comfort.
Support
Brooks provides neutral support for stability.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Cumulus 27 | Glycerin 21 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
| Upper | Engineered Mesh | Warp Knit |
| Outsole | FLUIDRIDE | DNA Loft v3 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $109.95, making them about 6% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, which retails for $114.95. For budget-conscious runners, the lower price of the Gel-Cumulus 27 might be an appealing factor, especially considering both shoes are designed to provide exceptional comfort and support. The price difference of $5 also positions the Gel-Cumulus 27 as a more attractive option for those who are looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 excels with its super-soft nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which offers a plush experience for runners. This shoe is designed for supreme comfort and provides maximum cushioning, making it ideal for long runs or varied workouts. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 utilizes a combination of FF BLAST PLUS technology and PureGEL technology to deliver a lightweight yet cushioned experience. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Glycerin 21 leans more towards an ultra-soft feel, whereas the Gel-Cumulus 27 balances comfort with responsiveness.
Support and Fit
The Brooks Women's Glycerin 21 is designed with neutral support, making it suitable for a wide range of runners. It features a plush internal fit and a broad platform that stabilizes the foot during runs, promoting smooth transitions. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 doesn't specify support type but highlights an engineered mesh upper for breathability and comfort. While both shoes ensure a good fit, the Glycerin 21's focus on stability may provide an advantage for runners who prioritize support in their footwear.
Breathability
Breathability is a key feature in both shoes, but they approach it differently. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 has an engineered mesh upper that enhances airflow, keeping feet cool during runs. This design is particularly beneficial for those who run in warmer conditions. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, with its newly engineered warp knit upper, also emphasizes breathability while providing a flexible and accommodating fit. Both models are designed to keep your feet comfortable, but the Gel-Cumulus 27 may have a slight edge in airflow due to its specific mesh construction.
Durability
Durability is an important factor for runners who want their shoes to withstand the test of time. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 features a FLUIDRIDE outsole, which contributes to smoother strides and enhances overall durability. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 uses advanced materials for the DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which is optimized for responsiveness and longevity. While both shoes are built to last, the ASICS model’s specific technologies may provide an extra layer of durability, particularly for those who log a lot of miles.
Aesthetics and Style
In terms of aesthetics, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 comes in a sleek Black/Concrete colorway that appeals to those looking for a modern and understated style. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, on the other hand, features a Black/Grey/White design, which adds a touch of versatility and can easily match various workout outfits. While personal preference plays a significant role in choosing running shoes, both options present stylish designs that can appeal to a wide audience of runners.
Sales Rank
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 has a sales rank of 8,263, indicating a solid market position among running shoes. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 holds a sales rank of 29,881, suggesting it may not be as popular among buyers at this time. A higher sales rank often correlates with customer satisfaction and product quality, hinting that the Gel-Cumulus 27 has gained more traction in the competitive running shoe market.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize price and a lightweight, cushioned feel, the Gel-Cumulus 27 is the better choice at $109.95. However, if supreme softness and an ultra-comfortable fit are what you're after, the Glycerin 21, priced at $114.95, may be worth the extra investment. Both shoes offer unique features that cater to different preferences, ensuring that there is a suitable option for every type of runner.

