ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and price, Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral wins on stability and fit.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers better cushioning and a lower price, while the Brooks Women's Glycerin Stealthfit 22 excels in stability and adaptive fit.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $5 cheaper
Cushioning
ASICS provides more padding
Breathability
ASICS has engineered mesh for better airflow
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral is better
Stability
Brooks offers better foot stabilization
Adaptive Fit
Brooks features a flat knit upper for comfort
Transition
Brooks ensures smoother heel-to-toe transitions
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 Neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Cumulus 27 | Glycerin Stealthfit 22 |
| Price | $109.95 | $114.95 |
| Sales Rank | 8263 | 14424 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Flat Knit |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is priced at $109.95, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 costs $114.95, making the ASICS shoe about 4.4% cheaper. Both shoes cater to female runners seeking comfort and support, but they achieve this through different technologies and designs. The Gel-Cumulus 27 is designed for those who prefer extra cushioning, whereas the Glycerin Stealthfit 22 emphasizes smooth transitions and a plush feel.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 features FF BLAST PLUS technology, which provides lightweight impact absorption and responsive rebound. This shoe is also equipped with PureGEL technology that enhances softness for smoother landings. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 boasts DNA Tuned cushioning, which combines larger cells in the heel for plush landings and smaller cells in the forefoot for energetic toe-offs. Both models focus on providing ample cushioning, but the ASICS shoe leans towards a more padded experience, while the Brooks shoe offers a balance of softness and responsiveness.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 showcases a sleek design in a Black/Concrete colorway, presenting a sporty look that appeals to many runners. Its engineered mesh upper improves breathability, contributing to overall comfort during runs. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 comes in a White/Grey/Black combination and features an updated flat knit upper that provides a blend of stretch and compression. This design not only enhances aesthetics but also adapts to the foot’s natural movement. While both shoes are visually appealing, the choice largely depends on personal style preferences.
Breathability
Breathability is a crucial factor for runners, and both shoes address this need effectively. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 uses an engineered mesh upper to enhance airflow, which is particularly beneficial during long runs or warmer weather. The Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 also incorporates a soft, flat knit upper that promotes ventilation and adapts to the foot's shape. While both shoes offer good breathability, the ASICS model's engineered mesh may provide a slight edge in terms of airflow due to its specific design.
Support and Stability
When it comes to support and stability, the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 is designed for runners who appreciate additional cushioning. Its FLUIDRIDE outsole helps create smoother strides, contributing to a stable feel. The Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 offers neutral support with a broad platform that stabilizes the foot, ensuring smooth heel-to-toe transitions. While both shoes provide adequate support, the Brooks shoe may be more suitable for those who prioritize stability during their runs.
Weight and Performance
The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 is touted as the lightest and most padded model in its series, which may appeal to runners looking for a lightweight option without sacrificing comfort. The Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22, while also designed for performance, focuses on delivering a cushioned ride with its advanced DNA Tuned technology. The specific weights of the shoes are not provided, but the emphasis on lightweight design in the ASICS shoe suggests it may be preferable for speed-oriented runners.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two models is notable, with the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 retailing for $109.95 and the Brooks Women's Glycerin Stealthfit 22 at $114.95. This makes the ASICS shoe about $5.00 cheaper, or approximately 4.4% less expensive. For budget-conscious buyers, this price difference may be a deciding factor, especially given that both shoes offer comparable features in terms of cushioning and support.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin Stealthfit 22 boils down to personal preferences. If you are looking for a shoe that prioritizes extra cushioning and breathability, the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 is a strong contender, especially at a lower price point. However, if you desire a shoe that emphasizes smooth transitions and adaptive fit, the Brooks Glycerin Stealthfit 22 could be the better choice. Both shoes are excellent options for runners, but understanding your specific needs and preferences will guide you to the right decision.

