ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and breathability, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running wins on price and style.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers superior cushioning and breathability, while the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav is a more affordable option with good comfort. Ultimately, the Gel-Cumulus is the better choice for serious runners.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Superior cushioning technology with PureGEL
Breathability
Engineered mesh upper enhances airflow
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank indicates popularity among runners
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running is better
Price
More affordable at $79.99
Versatility
Suitable for both running and casual wear
Weight
Lighter design for everyday use
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $109.95 | $79.99 |
| Sales Rank | 8263 | 2101 |
| Weight | Light | Very Light |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Bootie Construction |
| Outsole Technology | FLUIDRIDE | NDurance |
Dimension comparison
Design and Comfort
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes offer a highly cushioned experience, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe focuses on plush comfort. The design of the Gel-Cumulus includes FF BLAST PLUS technology, which provides lightweight impact absorption and a responsive rebound. In contrast, the Fresh Foam Roav features a bootie construction that wraps around the foot with a soft, sock-like feel. This difference in design leads to the Gel-Cumulus being better suited for those seeking enhanced cushioning, while the Fresh Foam Roav prioritizes a snug fit. Ultimately, if you prefer a more traditional running shoe feel, the Gel-Cumulus might be the better choice.
Cushioning Technology
In terms of cushioning technology, the Gel-Cumulus employs PureGEL technology for lightweight cushioning and softer landings, making it a great option for runners prioritizing joint protection. On the other hand, the Fresh Foam Roav’s fresh foam midsole is designed to absorb impact effectively, providing a plush feel during runs. The Gel-Cumulus retails for $109.95, while the Fresh Foam Roav is priced at $79.99, making the Roav approximately 27% cheaper. Runners who often experience discomfort may find the Gel-Cumulus’s superior cushioning beneficial, while those on a budget may prefer the Fresh Foam Roav without compromising too much on comfort.
Fit and Support
Fit and support are critical factors for any running shoe. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus features an engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability and comfort. This ensures a secure fit while allowing for airflow during runs. Conversely, the Fresh Foam Roav incorporates an Ultra Heel design that offers targeted support and a secure fit for prolonged wear. Both shoes provide adequate support, but the Gel-Cumulus’s breathable upper may be more appealing for runners in warmer climates. The choice between these two will also depend on personal preference regarding the fit, with the Gel-Cumulus perhaps being slightly more breathable.
Durability
Durability is essential for runners who log significant miles. The Gel-Cumulus has a FLUIDRIDE outsole that helps create smoother strides, ensuring a long-lasting running experience. Meanwhile, the Fresh Foam Roav features NDurance outsole technology, which is specifically designed to handle road miles and daily wear. While both shoes are built for durability, the Gel-Cumulus is ranked lower in sales at 8,263, compared to the Roav's rank of 2,101, which may suggest that more runners trust the Fresh Foam Roav for its durability. If longevity is a primary concern, either shoe should serve well, but the Fresh Foam Roav may have a slight edge based on its reputation.
Price
Price is a significant differentiator between the two models. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus is priced at $109.95, while the New Balance Fresh Foam Roav is available for $79.99. This makes the Fresh Foam Roav about 27% cheaper than the Gel-Cumulus, making it a more accessible option for budget-conscious consumers. While the price difference may reflect varying features and technologies, it also means consumers can save a substantial amount without sacrificing too much in terms of comfort and support with the Fresh Foam Roav.
Aesthetic Appeal
When it comes to aesthetics, personal preference plays a crucial role. The Gel-Cumulus features a sleek design in black and concrete, appealing to those who prefer a classic look. The Fresh Foam Roav, on the other hand, presents a more contemporary style with a combination of black and light aluminum, making it versatile for casual wear beyond running. Both shoes are visually appealing, but the choice largely depends on individual taste and how one intends to use the shoes outside of running.
Performance in Various Conditions
Both shoes are designed to perform well under various conditions. The Gel-Cumulus is engineered to provide a smoother stride and better breathability, making it suitable for longer runs or warmer climates. In contrast, the Fresh Foam Roav, with its durable outsole technology, is ideal for everyday wear and can handle the rigors of both running and casual outings. While the Gel-Cumulus excels in cushioning and breathable design, the Fresh Foam Roav offers great versatility. Depending on your running environment and frequency, either shoe can perform admirably.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Roav Running Shoe comes down to personal preference and budget. If you prioritize superior cushioning and breathability, the Gel-Cumulus is a solid option, albeit at a higher price of $109.95. For those looking for a more affordable choice without sacrificing too much on comfort, the Fresh Foam Roav at $79.99 offers excellent value. Both shoes have their strengths, so potential buyers should consider their specific running needs and financial constraints before making a decision.

