ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on cushioning and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers superior cushioning and durability, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Advanced cushioning technologies provide better support.
Durability
Built with materials designed for longevity.
Performance
Ideal for longer distances with smoother strides.
Why Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, is better
Price
Significantly cheaper option for budget-conscious buyers.
Breathability
Enhanced mesh upper for better airflow.
Weight
Lightweight design suitable for casual running.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Nike |
| Model | Gel-Cumulus 27 | Revolution 8 |
| Sales Rank | 8263 | 1608 |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Mesh |
| Midsole | FF BLAST PLUS | Foam |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is significantly more budget-friendly, retailing at $60.00, which is about 45% cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27, priced at $109.95. This substantial price difference makes the Nike model an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers or those new to running. The ASICS, while more expensive, offers advanced cushioning technologies that may justify the higher price for more serious runners. Overall, if you’re looking to save money, the Nike option stands out as the clear choice.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 excels with its advanced cushioning technologies. It features FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technologies, designed to provide lightweight impact absorption and responsive cushioning. This model is particularly appealing for runners seeking additional support and softness. The Nike Women's Revolution 8 also offers comfort with its foam midsole and breathable mesh upper, but it may not match the specialized cushioning that the ASICS provides. If maximum comfort is your priority, the ASICS is likely the better choice.
Breathability
Breathability is crucial for running shoes, especially during warmer months. The Nike Women's Revolution 8 stands out with its mesh upper, designed for enhanced breathability compared to its predecessor, the Revolution 7. This feature helps keep your feet cool while running. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 also includes an engineered mesh upper to improve breathability and comfort. While both shoes have breathable designs, the Nike may have a slight edge for those prioritizing airflow during runs.
Design and Aesthetics
Aesthetic appeal can play a significant role in a runner's choice of footwear. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 features a sleek design with reflective details that enhance visibility during low-light conditions. In contrast, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 presents a more minimalist look with a classic black and white color scheme. While personal preference ultimately dictates style choice, the ASICS offers additional functionality with its reflective elements, making it a practical option for evening runs.
Performance
In terms of performance, both shoes cater to different types of runners. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is designed for those who appreciate a cushioned ride, making it ideal for longer distances. Its FLUIDRIDE outsole contributes to smoother strides, which can enhance performance on longer runs. Conversely, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is geared more towards casual runners or those who prefer a lightweight feel. With a sales rank of 1,608, the Nike model shows strong popularity among users, indicating its effectiveness for standard running needs.
Durability
Durability is an essential aspect to consider when investing in running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 incorporates advanced materials and technologies aimed at prolonging the shoe's lifespan, particularly through its FLUIDRIDE outsole. This feature is designed to withstand the wear and tear of regular running. The Nike Women's Revolution 8, while built with quality materials, is primarily focused on comfort and may not have the same level of durability as the ASICS. For runners who prioritize longevity, ASICS may offer a more reliable option.
Weight
Weight can significantly affect running performance. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is noted for being both lightweight and well-cushioned, making it suitable for extended running sessions without causing fatigue. The Nike Women's Revolution 8 also promotes a lightweight experience but may focus more on comfort than on minimizing weight. While both shoes are designed to be light on the feet, the ASICS may be better suited for those who desire a combination of cushioning and low weight.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Nike Women's Revolution 8 comes down to your specific running needs and budget. If you are looking for advanced cushioning, durability, and a shoe that performs well on longer runs, the ASICS model is worth the investment at $109.95. However, if your focus is on affordability and a comfortable, breathable shoe for casual running, the Nike option at $60.00 is an excellent choice. Consider your running habits and preferences carefully to make the best decision.

