ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on breathability and cushioning, Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, wins on price and weight.
The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 offers superior comfort and advanced features, while the Nike Run Swift 3 is a budget-friendly option. Serious runners may prefer the ASICS model.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Advanced PureGEL technology enhances comfort.
Breathability
Engineered mesh upper promotes airflow.
Stability
FLUIDRIDE outsole provides smoother strides.
Why Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, is better
Price
More economical at $85.00.
Weight
Lighter overall design.
Style
Vibrant color options available.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $109.95 | $85.00 |
| Sales Rank | 8263 | 1650 |
| Cushioning Tech | FF BLAST PLUS | Foam cushioning |
| Upper Material | Engineered mesh | Standard mesh |
| Outsole | FLUIDRIDE | Standard rubber |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes are designed for runners who prioritize cushioning and comfort. Priced at $109.95, these shoes feature advanced technologies aimed at providing a soft and responsive experience during runs. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 boasts a bestseller rank of 8,263, which indicates a solid reputation among consumers. This model is particularly noted for its FF BLAST PLUS technology, which offers lightweight impact absorption, making it ideal for those looking to reduce joint stress while running.
Overview of Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes
The Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes are a budget-friendly option, retailing at $85.00, which is approximately 22% cheaper than the ASICS model. With a bestseller rank of 1,650, these shoes are popular among runners who prefer a stable fit. The Run Swift 3 features foam cushioning that provides a plush underfoot feel, and Flywire cables help secure the foot for added support. This model is geared towards those who appreciate a balance of comfort and affordability in their running footwear.
Comfort Features
When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 stands out with its PureGEL technology, which enhances cushioning and promotes softer landings. This model is touted as the lightest and most padded version ever, allowing runners to maintain comfort over longer distances. In contrast, the Nike Run Swift 3 also focuses on comfort with its foam cushioning, which provides a soft underfoot feel. However, the ASICS model incorporates multiple technologies aimed specifically at improving comfort during runs, making it a more cushioned choice overall.
Stability and Support
Stability is crucial in running shoes, and both models offer unique features to enhance this aspect. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 utilizes an engineered mesh upper that improves breathability and comfort, allowing for a secure fit while running. The FLUIDRIDE outsole contributes to smoother strides, which is essential for stability. On the other hand, the Nike Run Swift 3 employs Flywire cables that secure the foot when the laces are tightened, providing a stable fit during runs. While both shoes offer support, the ASICS model integrates more advanced technologies to enhance stability.
Breathability
Breathability is a significant factor for runners, especially over long distances. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 features an engineered mesh upper that promotes airflow, helping to keep feet cool during runs. This is crucial for maintaining comfort and preventing overheating. Conversely, the Nike Run Swift 3 does not specifically mention breathability features in its description. While it does provide a comfortable fit, the lack of detailed information on breathability may be a consideration for runners who prioritize this aspect.
Price Comparison
In terms of pricing, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 is the more economical choice at $85.00, making it about 22% cheaper than the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27, which retails for $109.95. This price difference could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers looking for reliable running shoes without compromising on quality. However, the ASICS model may justify its higher price with advanced features that enhance comfort and performance, particularly for serious runners.
Style and Aesthetics
Both the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Nike Run Swift 3 offer appealing designs that cater to different tastes. The Gel-Cumulus 27 is presented in a classic black and concrete colorway, suitable for those who prefer understated elegance. Meanwhile, the Nike Run Swift 3 showcases a more vibrant combination of white, black, pearl pink, and peony, appealing to runners who enjoy a more colorful aesthetic. Ultimately, individual style preference will influence the choice between these two models.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes and the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes comes down to individual needs and preferences. The ASICS model excels in advanced comfort features, stability, and breathability, making it a great choice for serious runners willing to invest in quality footwear. On the other hand, the Nike model offers a more affordable option without sacrificing essential comfort, appealing to casual runners or those on a budget. If advanced cushioning and support are your priorities, the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 is the way to go. However, if you're looking for a stylish, budget-friendly running shoe, the Nike Run Swift 3 is a solid contender.

