ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on performance and price, Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova wins on design.
The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 excels in performance and cushioning for serious runners, while the Skechers Endeavour offers great comfort at a lower price for casual wear.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS offers advanced technology justifying the higher price.
Performance
ASICS has superior cushioning and support for long-distance running.
Brand Reputation
ASICS is known for high-quality performance running shoes.
Why Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova is better
Affordability
Skechers is significantly cheaper.
Comfort
Skechers provides excellent everyday comfort.
Maintenance
Skechers is machine washable for easy care.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | FF BLAST PLUS | Max Cushioning |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Outsole | FLUIDRIDE | Natural Rocker |
| Washable | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes are priced at $109.95, while the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova Sneaker is about 38% cheaper at $67.74. This significant price difference may make the Skechers an appealing option for budget-conscious consumers. The ASICS model, while pricier, is often associated with higher performance running shoes, which could justify the investment for serious runners. However, the Skechers offer excellent value for everyday wear and light athletic activities, particularly given their features and comfort.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, both shoes excel, but they cater to different preferences. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 employs FF BLAST PLUS technology for lightweight impact absorption and PureGEL technology for softer landings. This combination aims to reduce stress on joints, making it suitable for long-distance runners. In contrast, the Skechers Endeavour features a Max Cushioning design, ULTRA LIGHT midsole cushioning, and an Air-Cooled Goga Mat insole. This setup provides notable comfort and support, making them ideal for casual wear or shorter runs. For those prioritizing cushioning during runs, ASICS might be the better choice, while the Skechers excel in everyday comfort.
Performance Features
The performance-oriented features of the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 focus on enhancing running efficiency. The engineered mesh upper improves breathability, while the FLUIDRIDE outsole promotes smoother strides, which is crucial for long-distance runners. In comparison, the Skechers Endeavour incorporates Natural Rocker Technology, designed for smooth heel-to-toe transitions, which benefits casual runners and walkers. Thus, serious athletes may find the ASICS more aligned with their needs, whereas casual users may appreciate the Skechers' transition-friendly design.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 comes in a sleek Black/Concrete colorway, offering a classic look appealing to traditional running shoe enthusiasts. Its design prioritizes functionality over fashion, making it suitable for various running environments. The Skechers Endeavour, on the other hand, presents a vibrant Blue/Orange palette, catering to those who prefer a more eye-catching style. The choice between these two designs may largely depend on personal taste—whether one favors a more subdued athletic look or a bold, colorful sneaker.
Weight and Breathability
Weight and breathability are crucial for running shoes, and both models perform well in these areas. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 is described as the lightest and most padded of its series, which contributes to an agile running experience. The engineered mesh upper enhances breathability, ensuring comfort during warm-weather runs. The Skechers Endeavour also features an engineered mesh upper with synthetic overlays, providing breathability and support. Though both shoes offer breathable designs, the ASICS may appeal more to those who prioritize lightweight performance in their running shoes.
Durability and Maintenance
Durability is a key consideration for running shoes, and both options are built to withstand regular use. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 is designed with high-quality materials that enhance longevity, making it a reliable choice for dedicated runners. Meanwhile, the Skechers Endeavour offers the added convenience of being machine washable, allowing for easy maintenance and care. For those who prioritize a low-maintenance option, the Skechers might be more appealing, while the ASICS may be seen as a long-term investment for serious athletes.
Brand Reputation
ASICS is renowned for its dedication to performance running shoes, often catering to serious athletes and runners. The Gel-Cumulus series has a solid reputation among running enthusiasts, reflected in its bestseller rank of 8,263, which suggests a loyal customer base. Skechers, however, has carved out a niche in the casual footwear market, with the Endeavour ranking at 989, indicating a strong following for their comfortable, stylish sneakers. Depending on whether one prioritizes performance or casual comfort, brand allegiance may sway the purchasing decision.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes and the Skechers Women's Max Cushioning Endeavour Canova Sneaker ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you are a serious runner seeking advanced cushioning and performance features, the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27, despite its higher price, offers superior technology and comfort for long distances. On the other hand, if you're looking for a budget-friendly option that provides excellent everyday comfort and casual support, the Skechers Endeavour is a fantastic choice. Both shoes have their strengths, so consider your priorities when making a decision.

