ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and breathability, Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, wins on value and weight.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers superior cushioning and comfort, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is a budget-friendly option with decent performance. Choose based on your priorities.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
Advanced cushioning technologies provide superior comfort.
Breathability
Engineered mesh upper enhances airflow.
Durability
FLUIDRIDE outsole contributes to longevity.
Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, is better
Price
More affordable option at $54.95.
Weight
Lighter weight enhances agility.
Popularity
Higher sales rank indicates consumer preference.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $109.95 | $54.95 |
| Sales Rank | 8263 | 5952 |
| Weight | Lightweight | 8.9 oz |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Breathable Mesh |
| Cushioning Tech | FF BLAST PLUS | Charged Cushioning |
Dimension comparison
Overview
When it comes to choosing the right running shoes, comfort and performance are key. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 are two popular options that cater to different running needs. The ASICS model is priced at $109.95, while the Under Armour option is about 50% cheaper at $54.95. This price difference sets the stage for a comparison of their features and performances.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 excels in comfort with its advanced cushioning technologies. It features FF BLAST PLUS technology for lightweight impact absorption and PureGEL technology for softer landings. This makes it an excellent choice for runners who prioritize cushioning during long runs. On the other hand, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 also offers a comfortable experience with its Charged Cushioning midsole, which provides responsiveness and durability. However, it may not match the level of plushness provided by the ASICS model.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is crucial for a comfortable running experience. The ASICS model incorporates an engineered mesh upper designed to enhance airflow and comfort. This feature is particularly beneficial during warm weather runs. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 also includes a lightweight, breathable mesh upper, complemented by synthetic overlays for added durability. Both shoes offer a good fit, but the ASICS may provide a slightly more comfortable experience due to its dedicated focus on breathability.
Durability
Durability is another important aspect for runners. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 employs a FLUIDRIDE outsole, which contributes to smoother strides and increased longevity. The shoe is designed to withstand regular use, making it a dependable option for avid runners. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 features a solid rubber outsole that covers high-impact zones, providing greater durability with less weight. While both shoes are built to last, the ASICS may have a slight edge due to its advanced materials.
Weight and Performance
Weight can significantly impact running performance. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is designed to be lightweight, making it suitable for runners looking for speed without sacrificing comfort. However, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is even lighter, weighing in at only 8.9 oz, which can enhance agility during runs. For runners who prioritize a minimalist feel, the Under Armour option may be more appealing, while those seeking cushioned support may prefer the ASICS model.
Style and Aesthetics
When it comes to style, both shoes present appealing designs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is available in a Black/Concrete color scheme that offers a sleek and classic look. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, also in a Black/Black/White combination, presents a modern aesthetic that can easily pair with various running outfits. Ultimately, personal preference will play a significant role in choosing between these two stylish options.
Pricing and Value
Price is a significant consideration for many buyers. At $109.95, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is about 17% more expensive than the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, which retails for $54.95. While the ASICS model offers superior cushioning and advanced technologies, those on a tighter budget may find the Under Armour option to provide excellent value without sacrificing too much performance.
Sales Rank and Popularity
Popularity can often influence purchasing decisions. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 holds a sales rank of 8,263, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 ranks higher at 5,952. This suggests that the Under Armour model is more favored among consumers, likely due to its lower price point and solid performance features.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 depends primarily on your specific running needs and budget. If you prioritize cushioning, breathability, and overall comfort, the ASICS model is likely the better choice, despite its higher price. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers decent performance and lightweight design, the Under Armour model is worth considering. Both shoes have their strengths, so weigh these factors carefully to find the best fit for your running style.

