vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on cushioning and durability, Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US wins on breathability and support.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers superior cushioning and lightweight design, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 is budget-friendly and supportive.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Cushioning

ASICS provides superior cushioning with FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technologies.

Weight

ASICS is known for being one of the lightest models.

Breathability

ASICS features an engineered mesh upper for enhanced breathability.

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US is better

Price

Under Armour is significantly cheaper at $57.95.

Support

Under Armour offers reinforced overlays for better midfoot support.

Versatility

Under Armour's outsole design enhances traction on various surfaces.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85
Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US
BrandASICSUnder Armour
ModelGel-Cumulus 27Charged Assert 9
Price$109.95$57.95
Sales Rank82632002
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshLightweight Mesh

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9, Black/White, 8.5 US

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is priced at $109.95, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 is significantly cheaper at $57.95. This makes the Under Armour model about 47% less expensive than the ASICS option. For budget-conscious shoppers, the price difference could be a key deciding factor, especially for those who are new to running or are looking for a reliable yet affordable shoe.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort and cushioning, both shoes are designed with the runner's experience in mind, but they take different approaches. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 features FF BLAST PLUS technology and PureGEL technology, which provide lightweight impact absorption and a responsive rebound, ensuring that each landing is soft and comfortable. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 utilizes Charged Cushioning, which offers balanced impact protection for smoother steps. This makes the ASICS model particularly appealing for those who prioritize plush cushioning during their runs.

Breathability

Breathability is another crucial factor for running shoes, and both models excel in this area. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is equipped with an engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability, making it suitable for long-distance runs. On the other hand, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 also features a lightweight mesh upper designed to boost airflow, keeping feet cooler during workouts. Both options provide excellent ventilation, which is essential for comfort during warmer weather.

Support and Stability

Support and stability differ between the two models, with the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 offering reinforced overlays that improve midfoot support. This feature helps keep the foot centered, especially during light training or longer walks. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 focuses more on cushioning, which may not provide the same level of structural support but compensates with its shock-absorbing technologies. Runners who require additional support may prefer the Under Armour model, while those seeking a cushioned ride might lean towards ASICS.

Weight

Weight can significantly impact the running experience, and this is an area where the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 shines. Known for being one of the lightest models in its series, it facilitates a more effortless stride. Although the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 is also designed to be lightweight, the specific weight comparison is not available in the provided data. Nevertheless, the emphasis on lightness in ASICS suggests a potential advantage for runners looking to enhance their speed and agility.

Traction and Outsole Design

Traction is essential for running shoes, and both models have distinct designs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 incorporates a FLUIDRIDE outsole, which aids in creating smoother strides, perfect for those who prioritize a seamless running experience. In comparison, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 features a rubber outsole with a flexible tread pattern, designed to enhance traction and natural flexibility on various surfaces. This could make the Under Armour model more versatile for different types of workouts, including both pavement and treadmill runs.

Aesthetic Appeal

The visual design of both models may influence a buyer's decision. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 comes in a sleek Black/Concrete colorway, appealing to those who prefer a more understated look. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 is available in a Black/White color scheme, which offers a classic and versatile appearance. Ultimately, aesthetic preferences will vary, but both models are designed to attract a broad audience.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 9 largely depends on individual needs and preferences. If you are looking for superior cushioning and a lightweight feel, the ASICS model may be the right choice, despite its higher price of $109.95. However, if budget is a primary concern and you still desire a comfortable, supportive shoe for casual running or workouts, the Under Armour model at $57.95 offers excellent value. Each shoe has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of runners.