ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White vs ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White leads on support and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 offers superior support and advanced features, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Gel-Pulse 17 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White is better
Advanced Features
Includes 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for stability.
Comfort
FF BLAST™ PLUS foam provides a plush experience.
Durability
Engineered mesh upper enhances overall durability.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $69.95.
Weight
Lighter design for casual use.
Simplicity
More straightforward design for everyday wear.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes, 8, Black/White | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | ASICS |
| Model | Gel-Kayano 32 | Gel-Pulse 17 |
| Cushioning | FF BLAST™ PLUS | AMPLIFOAM PLUS |
| Upper | Engineered Mesh | Mesh |
| Sales Rank | 3805 | 12467 |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to ASICS Running Shoes
When it comes to running shoes, ASICS is a name synonymous with quality and performance. In this comparison, we will explore the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes and the ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes. While the Gel-Kayano 32 is priced at $154.45, the Gel-Pulse 17 is significantly more budget-friendly at $69.95, making it about 55% cheaper. Both models cater to different types of runners, emphasizing comfort, support, and design features tailored to enhance your running experience.
Design and Aesthetics
The ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 boasts a lightweight, breathable mesh upper that reduces the need for additional overlays, contributing to its sleek design. It features a unique gradient spray on the upper and midsole, inspired by the colors of sunrise and sunset. In contrast, the Gel-Pulse 17 also features a mesh upper but focuses more on practicality with a molded rubber outsole. While the Gel-Kayano 32 stands out with its vibrant aesthetic, the Gel-Pulse 17 offers a more understated look. The Gel-Kayano 32's design is not just about looks but also about keeping your feet cool and comfortable during runs, particularly in warmer seasons.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the Gel-Kayano 32 is engineered for a plush experience. It features the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, which provides adaptive stability and enhances your stride during distance training. The shoe's FF BLAST™ PLUS foam midsole offers a smooth and balanced ride, making it ideal for long runs. On the other hand, the Gel-Pulse 17 utilizes AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, designed to provide a softer and more comfortable ride compared to standard cushioning. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Gel-Kayano 32 is specifically tailored for runners seeking enhanced support and stability.
Performance Features
The Gel-Kayano 32 incorporates advanced technologies like the Rearfoot PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, ensuring superior shock absorption and cushioning. It also features a 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION that enhances compression and caters to individual gait differences. In comparison, the Gel-Pulse 17 comes with Rearfoot GEL technology for shock absorption and a sockliner that promotes moisture management and breathability. While both shoes are designed for performance, the Gel-Kayano 32's features cater more to serious runners, while the Gel-Pulse 17 serves as a great option for casual runners seeking comfort.
Target Audience
The Gel-Kayano 32 is aimed at dedicated runners who require extra support and stability during their training. With a bestseller rank of 3,805, it is well-regarded among serious athletes. Conversely, the Gel-Pulse 17, with a lower bestseller rank of 12,467, is tailored for beginners or those who run less frequently. This distinction in target audience is reflected in their price points and technological features, with the Gel-Kayano 32 justifying its higher cost through advanced technology and targeted support.
Durability and Build Quality
Durability is a crucial factor in any running shoe purchase. The Gel-Kayano 32 is built with an engineered mesh upper, which not only provides breathability but also enhances the shoe's overall durability. Its construction is designed to withstand the rigors of extensive training without compromising comfort. On the other hand, the Gel-Pulse 17, while still durable, focuses more on everyday wear with a standard mesh upper and a molded rubber outsole. The Gel-Kayano 32's superior build quality may make it a better investment for those who run regularly and require a shoe that can endure high mileage.
Price Comparison
Price is a significant factor when choosing running shoes. The Gel-Kayano 32 is priced at $154.45, while the Gel-Pulse 17 retails for $69.95. This means that the Gel-Pulse 17 is approximately 55% cheaper than the Gel-Kayano 32. For budget-conscious consumers or those new to running, the Gel-Pulse 17 presents an attractive option without sacrificing essential comfort and support. However, for experienced runners who are willing to invest in their footwear for enhanced performance, the Gel-Kayano 32 justifies its price through its advanced features.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Kayano 32 and the Gel-Pulse 17 comes down to your running needs and budget. If you are a serious runner looking for advanced support, comfort, and durability, the Gel-Kayano 32 is worth the investment at $154.45. However, if you are a casual runner or just starting out, the Gel-Pulse 17 offers excellent comfort and functionality at a more accessible price of $69.95. Both shoes have their unique strengths, but understanding your running style and preferences will guide you to the right choice.

